Present scientists think that first there was a homogeneity of
gas, then it was collecting itself and then it was
accidentally taking structures. They are introducing
mathematical models made by probability theory. These
scientists think about an "early" universe of
homogeneous gas only.
But we never need to do so. Homogeneity of some gas in the
universe center did not have an evolution to those structures
of cells we can observe today.
We don't have to say an "early" universe. Better
we must call this state the small universe in the beginning.
What is the difference, first it seems to be without it? The
difference is small, but extremely important for all the
following science:
To this time in that central gas, born from the central
protocosms, more protocosms were flying up with the task
to install bigger structures laying above this central
cloud of homogeneity.
What things are protocosms? A protocosm is a non-stationary
Black White Hole. Non-stationary means, first it is closing
during a process of collapse. But this state does not lock
completely. The theoretical Black Hole will not be completed,
but divergently reached dependent on collapse energy. A state
that is not locked and which is not a Black Hole completely
is able to expand and to decay, because it is unstable. This
state is well-known under the hypothetical concept "white
hole". Here we have the combination: the divergent Black
Hole reaches an area of returning caused by internal evolution
by internal oscillation during its flight (worm hole), and then it changes into a white hole.
First it had a collapse (condensation) before. Then it has an anticollapse
(evaporation),
when all the quantized structures are ejected with gigantic
energy radiations (quasars and GRBs).
Do you want to read about this state in my theory and its
solutions, here is list about
them.
For quick information:
See, small protocosms carry a small storage of mass M and
energy. A gigantic lot of small protocosms explodes in the
center of the universe in the first phase of its installation.
Among them, the bigger features of protocosms are flying up.
Time after time and step by step, these protocosms are opened
having an anticollapse. This way the structures do not come
from the central gas, installed by the very small protocosms,
but from the successively bigger protocosms on higher
locations! And this way, there was not one big bang but an innumerable quantity of
bangs called anticollapses. At last, this kind of evolution
was not a total expanding of the whole universe with escaping
galaxies. The universe was installed step by step. On the
first layer of gas the second layers of gas bodies were given.
No escaping velocity! On a lot of layers of gas some times a
layer of small galaxies was given etc. No galaxy was escaping!
All the installed objects are resting just at this time they
have got their place at some layer of universe.
Where does the red shift come from if not from the Doppler
effect of escaping objects?
Don't you like a different solution? If you answer "yes" and
if you like ignoring every better thought to explain this
problem, please, go to another website of main-stream physics.
When you are open for new ideas, come along,
please.
And now, what would happen with the completely installed
universe, when it has got its maximum radius - its amplitude?
Open masses (sum of all M) will be having their collapse
supported by radiation and forming
protocosms contracted by the mass below and flying down to the
center of universe, passing a trip down where the other
protocosms were formed out. If then all the mass of the universe
is packed into protocosms, these states are running around the
gravitational center flying up again and installing a further
period of universe.
This is a totally oscillating universe! Stephen W. Hawking
does not see this possibility because of wrong theses of the
main-stream physics. Do you want to inform about Hawking's
opinion? Don't forget to come back to me, please, why he
is wrong.
Immediately, from equations and from my opinion, I saw the
world oscillating. Look around,
