beginning, there is Einstein's equation E = mo
c². [mo is resting mass at particles and
momentum masse mw at wavequanta; c is the vacuum
velocity of light]
Additionally, there is Planck's equation E = h f. [h is
Planck's constant and f is the frequency of an
oscillation or of a vibration]
That means that the matter has both manifestations:
energy. Old concepts
of matter as material are historic. Philosophically,
matter is the complete thing, which is filling the
universe, so it is both energy and mass. You could
say: gravitation's cosmos and radiation's cosmos are
forming a unit.
Interpreting Planck's equation you can see that the
energy comes from an oscillation with the frequency f.
Then I set both equations equal
with the energy, and I
get the equation for the resting mass mo = h
f /c² .
Here you can see that also the mass comes from a
process of the oscillation. If you calculate the mass of
a proton of 1.6726 x 10-27 kg into an
oscillation by using this equation, you get 2.2 x1023
Hz. What a vibration should this be? Some scientists
mean to use that magnitude simply by Heisenberg's
uncertainty. They interpret that a particle was probable
during the time of 4.4 x10-24 s. I was
thinking another way, when I asked for the amplitude of a
possible spherical vibration of the particle. Therefore,
I presupposed the hypothesis, the particle makes a Tesla
wave by its spherical wave-like oscillation, which is all
over spherically exchanged by wavequanta and which causes the real
manifestation of the mass attraction - the gravitation.
The amplitude of the proton, I calculated to Ro
= 2.1 x10-16 m. Then I asked myself what ever
would be inside of that proton?
I had a fantastic idea. My hypothesis was:
matter consists of a system of
Black Holes (BH) and so of microcosms, which puzzle out the macrocosm -
that's a Hierarchy.
Therefore, I looked at Einstein's simple solution of
the horizon ro of a static Black Hole:
= 2 G Mo / c². [there G is the gravitation
constant and Mo is the internal mass]
Why is there the number of 2? Let's make it simply! I
had clues from the general Relativity Theory:
Ro = ro / 2 = G Mo /
This would mean that at the inside of a BH, the
internal mass M would just reach to half the total
horizon. There, this mass Mo
like a bubble and cause the external mass mo.
A second amount of Mo
is the summ of the masses of all the photons and fallons
in the cosm. I call it a radiation cosm above the mass
Supporting this hypothesis, I just could assume that
the exchange waves of the internal gravitation would
also be locked in its BH, just as the exchange
wavequanta of the
electromagnetic waves - for example of the light.
I represented the mass mo as amplitude Ro
and set it equal to Ro from equation of BH.
In the result of the calculation of all the constants, I
got a new constant k (sometimes I called it kappa,
another time it was d) and the following relations:
Mo = k / mo
with k = 4.7 x 10-16
The internal mass Mo of one single proton
would be equal to 280 billion kg!!
Is this unreal or slippery?!
It isn't plausible to me anymore that famous
scientists cannot think in cohesions and in reciprocal
If you set this mass M and the external mass m into
one equation of gravitation force using the distances of
the amplitudes, then you get such a strange force, which is about
1039-times larger than the gravitation force
between both nucleons. Just this is the magnitude of
nuclear force or of strong force between nucleons. Is it unreal?
How does the internal cosm-mass vibrate then (yellow
area at the picture below here)? Does it simply fall
together? Is it simply just a bubble? No, it doesn't.
In the reality, the elongation is just apparently an
oscillation. There, the complete mass-body
isn't vibrating! The vibration of the mass-sphere
(yellow) just seems to be in such a way, because the mass
parts and partons are built up and rebuilt down repeating this
Only light waves and gravitation waves draw their
circles (4) from the center (2) to the amplitude (line 3
makes upper rest dots) and back - only the wave ways
draw an oscillation procedure:
The circles even have an order! Very light
particles could fly alongously the light line, too, for example
the neutrinos. Heavy particles do not come near enough
to the light speed. Therefore, I looked for a solution
of very light particles. This solution, I found as I saw
the reversed relations of internal and external mass like above
shown with the equation and the constant k. Following, the
the mass Mo=2 x 1030 kg could
disappear in such a BH, which then would weigh just
about mo=2 x 10-46 kg, lighter
than a neutrino. BHs, made from galaxies, would be yet
much lighter. Then all the BHs would fly through the
universe just on both violet bows, and there would not be
any real evolution of the things in universe. Another
solution was helping me: If a BH was formed from the
outside (collapse and condensation), then it is not really locked, but it
is just divergently locked or closed. If such an
divergently locked cosm expands again after
contraction, so it must burst apart (by anticollapse and
evaporation). This manner of unstable particles, therefore unstable
BH, I called then Protocosms. They are made
from radiation mass, resting mass and much more energy.
They burst apart (evaporate) and give free
their radiation and their inside mass (cf. quasars). So beneath the radiations, the protocosms fly on bows
through the universe. Shortly living protocosms decay
just after the center passage of the universe. They are
small, externally heavy and of multiple number (innumerable
number). Inside, they are relatively light. The
innumerable number of this type of protocosms makes an
almost homogeneous mash of matter (energy and mass)
during its decay in the proximity of the universe
center. Present scientists think, this phenomenon would
be the "Big Bang", and this would be the only
effect of creating the whole universe.
But protocosms, which are living longer and which
are lighter can fly away from this first bang. Depending on the longevity, they decay on elongation
bows, which are successively higher, until the last of
them, the lightest and internally heaviest protocosms
reach the amplitude of their BH including all of them.
See - our universe is a Black Hole, and it is
oscillating! In its center, there is something like a
feature of "big bang", but above this, there is piled up the real rest of the
matter! This bang is just a Small Bang followed by a
turn of a lot of Smaller Bangs.
No matter what ever, a stable cosm, the universe, the proton,
the electron, the neutrino, they all together work
following the same principles. Additionally, there are
the protocosms as unstable compounds of unstable
particles and the ordinary unstable particles. Each
galaxy, each star, but also the universe include a core
at its center, which generates protocosm pairs one after
the other. There is a Divergent Sphere DS, in which
center protocosms arise.
Protocosms can burst apart and
Unstable particles do not burst apart during their
decay. The logic is: they are destabilized stable BHs.
If they are eating energy, then they send out energy in
parity - these are particle pairs, with them they are
coupling temporarily. In the end, the stable particle is
coming back. Stable particles do not eat mass of
different particles, but they interact with the energy
of these partners in parity. During weak interaction,
there can be a change of the partons of particles (cf.
my TBAIII). This fact has
given to me a totally different opinion about particles - a complex imagination of spherically oscillating
and non-stationary Black White Holes BWH. The string
theory limps behind me for decades.
In the end, I have discovered these solutions from
General Relativity Theory and found there the
Oscillators, which nobody than me has seen there before
in this special feature.
Therefore, my solution is the "Oscillator Solution" of the
Relativity Theory (Arcus 1987). World formulae
were the results of the General Relativity Theory,
because they express the unit of matter and Quantum Theory, but now in a different manner than all the
If particles are the causes of waves for exchanging
gravitation and exchanging electrostatic force - then
waves made by relative movements of particles cannot be
the same as particles! Particles are not equal to waves,
but they are the OSCILLATORS (resonators) - they are the PRODUCERS of
the primary Tesla wavequanta. While their relative movement
of these oscillators, they cause those secondary wave
types (secondary e.m. and g.m. wavequanta as secondary
transversal and as secondary longitudinal waves).
Consequently, my theory leads to a simple
interpretation of the wave's system:
Corresponding to Einstein's opinion, the singularities
of gravitational field
inside of the stable elementary particles, protons and
electrons. Let's use the example of the electron. It has
a mass of about 9 x 10-31 kg. Electron's
mass ¾ the force of its
comes from the
pulsation of the spherical surface of the electron as a
During this event, the electron contracts to an
extremely small minimum and expands to its maximum of
about 3.9 x 10-13 m while the time period of
just about 10-20 seconds. This way, the
pulsating surface radiates momenta into every direction.
These are the primary wavequanta,
which cause the gravitation.
Each particle exchanges momenta with other particles -
wavequanta. The exchange leads to the attraction
between all the particles of our ordinary matter. The
complete thing appears like a monopolar field, but it is
a primary dipole field, absolutely coupled with
all the other. Each mass is a monopole model.
Each electric charge is a monopole model, too,
and analogously to the gravitation explicable as a
longitudinal spherical wave, starting from elementary
charge. The electric charge receives such wavequanta
from the other charges.
Imagine, the electron was single in space. Then there
is no reason that the exchange wavequanta would not
must run straight ahead. Instead of the concept of
exchange quanta, we can simplify it to field lines. The
field lines run from the electron into all directions as
if they were prickles. Because of the pulsations, the
field lines become new after sending of every new
exchange quantum. They consist of bullets, which I
called wavequanta. Especially, I called them Primary
When we move the electron, then the field lines will
be curved. The cause is: the quanta are shot into a new
direction while each changing and emitting. The curved field line forms a middle dot
anywhere in space, where is the radius of the particle
orbit. The force vector shows into the center of the
circle. There, the secondary singularity of the new
curved field is born. The result is nothing more than
the center of the magnetic field, which now is a bipolar
field or a dipole because of a speed lower than light
speed in vacuum.
Each change of the position of the primary exchange
field (of primary dipoles) - if gravitational, if electric
or both - makes a secondary wavequantum in space, where
now a bipolar magnetic field is running. This wave
consists of components of the seemingly monopolar field (of
gravitational or electric field) and of the rotating
field (of the magnetic field, if gravitationally or
electrically caused). Therefore, it is right:
electromagnetic waves are secondary waves, which are made
of moving electric charges. In my theory, such secondary
waves made by moving masses, didn't get the simple name
gravitation waves but gravitomagnetic waves.
When finally magnetic fields rotate or convert, then
secondary vibrations come into space, which have a
determined frequency. These vibrations are continuing
themselves as secondary wavequanta.
From these reasons, wavequanta cannot be equal to
those elementary particles, which are causing resp.
producing them at
all. Particles are the oscillators/ resonators or vibration
generators, in rest when they make the gravitation and
the electric charge (electrition), in movement to each other when they
make the gravitomagnetic and electromagnetic wavequanta!
The radius of a
particle's orbit shows to the particle starting from the
center of the path. The wave amplitude of that magnetic
field shows into the center of the orbit starting at the
particle's position. Both vectors are contrary to each
other. At that position, where the magnetic quantum is, there is not
the particle's position! There is the center of the particle's
orbit. At that location, where the particle is, there is not the
magnetic quantum's position, because there is the particle's
Schrödinger and his interprets have set
equal the position of the magnet quantum to the
particle's position statistically, following the
interpretation of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle -
that was the perfect mistake. Since then, physicists think,
particles would be statistically solved into a feature
of dust of their own waves. That would be a dual nature
of particles and waves. But dual
nature doesn't really exist! More or better, a Cohesion
between Oscillators, the particles themselves, and
Wavequanta, generated by particles, is reality.
Those are my sites
of my theory about World Formula named
Ideal-Oscillator-Theory, just as a variant of the
Unified Field Theory