ARCUS:  The World Formula and its Solutions

Consequently constructed using the results of Albert Einstein and Max Planck leading to the Unified Field Theory

The Preaching
The Universe - a Hierarchy of different kinds of "Black Holes"

Again I read publications about these "black holes" in galaxy cores (bdw 9/02). Who doesn't own the united theory of fields only can conclude from observations about such things - and - can be mistaken, naturally. My theory shows: All the galaxies have "black holes" in their center and not only there! The question is how the so-called black hole is described by this united theory of fields.

In this theory of mine, the black hole is a non-stationary - better: it is an oscillating object, while the complete present physics interprets Schwarzschild's solution as stationary object.

The non-stationary black-white hole was named by me to be a COSMOS.

Stable cosms are oscillating spherically and harmonically. To keep stable, they eject energy, which was supported to them before. The stable elementary particles like protons and electrons, but also our complete universe - the macrocosm count to them! Proton's spheres vibrate 2.2·1023 times per second. The universe oscillates every 17.6 billion years for one pulse of half a period. Universe isn't flat! Observers conclude the universe seem to be open and flat (cf. bdw 6/2001), because they don't know the united theory of fields. They take their conclusions like those observers on earth thousand years before, when they thought the earth would had been flat.

Unstable cosms are the results of destabilizations of cosms which were stable, which now oscillate faster and represent more mass. Such unstable particles do not decay in the sense of the word "decay", but they give free parities of matter which particle balance is zero. What stays in the end, this is the stable particle, which was destabilized and the energy, which was supported for this process. Conservation laws are valid for baryons, leptons and for energy: Nobody can produce or destroy the particles protons, electrons and stable neutrinos already existing in universe. The sum of energy remains constant.

Bigger compounds of unstable particles are forming another kind of unstable cosm, which really can DECAY in the sense of this word into single particles and their energies. This kind of cosm I call Protocosm, briefly PK (from German sign).

Mesons as unstable particles are the smallest and still open pre-states of protocosms! If an electron e- and a positron e+ are there, so they annihilate themselves completely, e. g. pi-zero-mesons p o. If an neutrino-pair are coupled with an electron and an antineutrino, e. g. in pi-minus-meson p -, then the annihilation of the neutrino-pair accelerates the remaining electron and antineutrino. Both get free. (annihilation is the complete compensation of a particle with an antiparticle sending radiation quanta)

How can we prove the existence of protocosms?

The universe is a system filled of cosms. Each subsystem consists of protocosms, subprotocosms and their subprotocosms and so on into a deep of structure, which programs the origin. There is the cosmic information!

Let's take the example of protocosms in the centers of all galaxies, all stars and all their substructures:

While such a PK is expanding and falling apart, it radiates and sends out subprotocosms on their journey, objects which become to new stars and their subsystems during their own decay. In this state, the PK is open, but extremely dense, near the theoretical radius of the theoretic "black hole". Old innumerable stars rotating in its neighborhood are falling to it and give it its food. While the PK gets denser this way, its horizon starts to fall again. The PK reaches a divergent state to the "black hole". Because the matter is falling from the outside, my theory solutes this fall-process like following: The velocity of falling never reaches vacuum light velocity. Therefore this kind of cosm is never completely closed or locked. It never reaches to the theoretical horizon of a black hole. The radius of a PK is never equal to the gravitational radius of a black hole, but always a little bit larger. This is decisive! For this reason, the PK can fall apart again in a time, which is as short as the forming time was - some times extremely short. The PK so runs through half a period of an oscillation - through one single pulse then. This is enough to be right speaking of an oscillation, because the PK has different qualities during this short time.

Insides of the PK the matter will be formed out following the laws becoming a hierarchical structure of subprotocosms and of their subs etc. The PK works like a cleaning equipment and like a sorting device while it is contracting.

Present physicists think of contraction of cosms simply of falling matter - all together - when it is heating up. Following the united theory of fields, this is not right. While the contraction, subprotocosms are formed. In this objects themselves, sub-subprotocosms are made, etc., down to the hierarchy which seems to be unlimited, but has a programed limit in the end. All the PK have fundamentally one or more electric charges. The just made sub-PK are surely falling to the center of its PK while they contract themselves. That space which is necessary in the center shrinks together to a singular minimum. There the sub-PK do not collide, but they rotate apart following the movement's laws of electric charges of particles. Here they reach into the proximity of vacuum light velocity. Then they climb up again and strive apart. This way the sub-PK start opening themselves, firstly in the center of the PK and then upwards. The last locked sub-PK will have supported and skid off by that energy which was coming free behind them (analogy: Inflation of cosmos!).

Such a PK in the center of a galaxy therefore is not stationary and this way it isn't steady open with the steady same attraction force. During this short time being a contracting and an expanding PK, it is divergently locked and unsteady in its gravitational attraction force to the outside. Gravitational relations of the inside are locked completely. The internal gravitation then cannot be measured from the outside! Just the same as no light can get to the outside. At the outside, the PK only can be measured following the equation: m = h f / c². That mass m of the PK then is a function of its spherical frequency f. Planck's quantum h and the vacuum velocity of light c are constants. The mass M, which is packed into the PK, at the outside the mass m follows this equation of constants: m = 4.7x10-16 kg² / M. This way, our sun of the mass of M = 2x1030 kg had a PK of the mass of m = 2.35x10- 46 kg (as this object decayed, from the subs the planets and from the sub-subs the satellites of the planets came out, etc. down to the pre-states of life; in the center the rest of the PK remained - our proto-sun).

The return from such a big mass to such a insignificantly small mass reflects the discontinuity of the mass of the PK. Naturally, you can miss your chance to observe it, which has happened today. Though, this detail is decisive! The discontinuity of gravitation decides about the complete constitution and about the evolution laws of universe and of matter which is there!

PK will be energetically changed while their existence. They can get weaker. PK then are hardly able to eject their subs far away (PK also can die out). You see it at our sun. It collected enough gas and rest-structures of first sub-PK to its proximity, which today make its observable and shining sun surface. Our star doesn't eject proto-planets any more, but sun spots and protuberances. Also our earth surprises us only with vulcano, which show us sub-PK's movements of the past.

You see that stars also have protocosms, because mostly a pulsar results from supernova. I called the pulsar a naked star core - and so a naked protocosm. But such naked it isn't, although it has less shell than before as star. In its center there is the protocosm, which stands in relationship with its relatively weak shell. The radiation, which was induced by the opening PK, leads to the electromagnetic quanta in pulse periods.

The brain like also the eye - all these phenomena are parts of the programed pre-functions of protocosms. I cannot be surprised at their "evolution". Protocosms open up themselves and make a new world, which is changing by interactions. During this, all gets subtly differentiated and developed on. Therefore there was no creative big bang of human being 50000 years ago, as it is asserted (cf. bdw 7/2002)

More articles about this themes you find below "Errors of Main-Stream-Physics".

Arcus, 08-20-2002

· All rights reserved: Arcus (Heinz-Joachim Ackermann, since1998) ·