It will hardly be possible to convince the world especially the established
physicians generation to recognize the correctness of the solutions of my
Unified Field Theory.
Here are the three articles:
1st About Oscillating Black
Holes; 2nd About the new
Protonneutrino; 3rd About the
new Interpretation of Heisenberg's uncertainty relation
Much too much thinkers are convinced of their own exotic solutions - perhaps
there are ten thousands of them, so that here may be a confused chaos of ideas.
I tried to study some of such exotic ideas which are published in the web,
because they are ignored by the main stream physics.
The result is: I do not understand these strange derivations, and those
publishers certainly wouldn't understand my derivations relatively strange, too.
How can you prove it? Theories find their correctness in the praxis.
I didn't write an exotic mathematic theory than more I solved the relativity
theory deeper, I corrected the interpretations of the quantum theory. From this
I created a complex solution which reflects the world in a unity. My
assertions result which can be checked:
- I predicted a new particle type: the proton neutrino,
pair formation temperature: 248.5 K. Proof: The
Casimir effect consists of pair formations and annihilations of these
particle pairs because they are formed at -24,5° C and annihilated at -149°
C. Between both values the play of the pairs is given, and there is no proof
of Heisenberg's uncertainty or of virtual vacuum corpuscles!
- I predicted the antimass at the
anti-particles like positrons and antiprotons. But it isn't provable at
unstable particles like at mesons. You must examine these antiparticles
which are called above. Indirect proof: Particle
pairs compensate (annihilate) themselves to pure energy of radiation. This
way the quality of gravitation disappears. Consequently, positive and
negative gravitation should be compensated.
- I predicted the discontinuity of the gravitation
of the black holes, so that the total mass of a celestial body has to swell,
which at least includes one oscillating black hole. Proof:
The behavior of the pulsars. At their whole surface the radiation pulsates
between the states: divergently closed or opened, but again on its way to be
closed. It is improbable that there only is sent one pole-ray if one can
discover many pulsars after supernovae - a pole ray only drives a ring but
it does not reach the complete space.
- I gave the basic law in opposition to the present opinion after which the
unstable particles would lead to the beginning of all if one would find the
most unstable corpuscle of them - the "original particle": The elementary
of the stable particles. But I notice: All the unstable particles are
descended of the stable particles. The decay exactly leads back to the
identical stable particle which was destabilized before: This is the
sentence of the conservation of the stable elementary particles. Indirect
proof: The decay leads identically to just that stable particle which was
destabilized before: Centence of conservation of stable elementary particles
(leptons and baryons).
- I predicted the existence of protocosms,
which fast arise from collapses when they are packing masses and when they
get lighter as a substructured package. Protocosms loose their external mass
the more internal mass they pack. They zipp the mass then! While zipping in
the computers, amounts of data will be packed to smaller values. As fast as
protocosms are made they fall out of each other and re-zipp these masses
which were packed before. Because the zipping masses and energies were
ordered after the quantum laws, rotation systems of order get free while the
re-zipping. You can examine this, if you will shoot the particles strongly
together using particle accelerators that the so-called black holes would
result. After the present opinion they had to exist a while and eat matter
(today one thinks at cosmic periods until the black hole will burst). But I
say: protocosms will be made by the crash in particle accelerators which
will have a very short existence time. Then the protocosm will decay very
fast. The decay speed can be calculated. At small black holes of this
feature, the decay speed reaches to the smallest fractions of a second like
well known of unstable particle decays. While its existence time, the
protocosm is wandering away with next to light speed. The protocosm explodes
at a different position. These processes are comparable because they are a
unit! Indirect proof: After supernovae one finds
new or young stars near this area.
- If a mass free of electric charge is rotating or moving, then a
gravitomagnetic wave is arising - consisting of the static gravitational
field and of its movement in the shape of its gravitomagnet.
This already EINSTEIN was able to derive. My theory consequently showed that
between the electrodynamics and my gravitodynamics
an absolute connection is given. Just one difference is valid: While in
electric state the same polarizations are repulsing themselves, they are
attracting themselves in gravitation. Following, you will some times prove
at fast rotating masses that gravitomagnets of the same denominator will
attract themselves. Indirect proof: All the planets
rotate into one direction. Just like them, the suns rotate around the galaxy
core. The gravitation magnets add themselves preferentially in the center of
the orbits because the pole with a
common denominator attract each other above and below their orbit areas.
- I gave the theoretical explanation of the corpuscles: CORPUSCLES
especially both the stable particles - protons and electrons - are
spherically pulsating microcosms, therefore they are small bubbles which
each are cosms themselves in a micro shape. Because of their oscillation,
particles become to oscillators of spherical Tesla-waves. The exchange of
the momenta by these waves makes the primary gravitation force between the
particles. Here, I idealized them to Tesla-waves of spherical shape. Really,
they are separated into both I called them: half a belly and half a back.
Obviously, all the gravitational particles of normal matter each are
couppled with their bellys and their backs from the beginning. Well known,
you can't get vacuum light speed at the perimeter when the return of the
coupling woud be possible. Because this is impossible, all the particles
stay in gravitation to each other inside of their given momentum exchange. Proof:
The gravitation acts monopolarly and all over as the electrostatics, too.
- Consequently, anti-particles of anti-matter would be coupled with each
other to be gravitational. It is logical that they should be repulsing
against our normal matter. Indirect proof: The
annihilation into energy.
- I predict that electric charges are such a kind of elementary microcosms
which are the smallest, but the strongest exchangers of energy of
Tesla-waves. These mini-microcosms are cached in their gravitational
microcosms of the stable particles. From there, they exchange their own wave
structures of Tesla-waves (primary electromagentic longitudinal-waves). This
way the electrostatic attraction and repulsion forces result. Obviously here
the coupling of the bellys and the backs is primarily given in such a way
that just backs and bellys make the attraction by contrasts, and the same
wave-quanta lead to the repulsion. Indirect proof:
The so-called "vacuum polarization of the electron". This is the
measurement of a radius of about 10-13 m where are innumerable
positive and negative charges but only one charge of them makes the negative
surplus. These are the internal protocosms of the electron. They discovered
the real radius of the electron without knowing what they have done.