There aren't any Black Holes!
This world is incomplete. No ideal is reality. The Black
Hole cannot exist therefore at all, closed completely.
Instead of it unstable Dark-gray Holes really are
existing which never come close to the black-hole-state
because they only diverge against it. I called these
things which really exist "protocosms". They
are formed while real time and after going real time
they burst open. They contain the so-called "dark
matter" into vast amounts. Only a cosmos type may
be black, if it is absolutely stable as electrons.
So many years after publishing my theory, physicists of
main stream physics tell you about the black holes
hypotheses without real knowledge:
"A black hole is an object so
massive and compact that gravity prevents even light
from escaping." nature, vol 407, 14 September 2000,
news and views, page 146, Nicholas White: Imaging black
Please, imagine, if electromagnetic
force even like gravitational force would be caused by
exchange quanta of a wave function, what has the gravity
to do when it is so dense on and inside its black hole?
Does it just prevent light from
escaping? Or does it prevent itself from escaping, too?
We had to answer both questions with
yes. But when we did it, no scientist could explain what
for an object a black hole could be. It wouldn't be able
to be identified. No light, no gravity, no
"smile". It would not exist (therefore I say:
black holes of present opinions do not really exist!).
My theory doesn't give such a black hole imagined above
by present scientists. I myself see a solution of
oscillating black holes. When the complete mass is
closed under the inside coordinate system of my black
hole, the only property or quantity at the outside is
the measurement of its oscillation frequency. The more
of it, the heavier is this non-stationary black hole
(please, remark: this body is a sphere, its oscillation
is a spatial body vibration into all directions with the
same action and the same intensity like we know it well
of gravity and electric charge). Such a large black hole
cannot vibrate so fast in the same time while a smaller
one does it. So the bigger black hole is lighter than
the smaller. This kind of non-stationary black holes I
named: protocosms when they are unstable
particles, and when they are stable, then they are our
well-known particles like protons and electrons
(they are real microcosms). Have you ever seen
into a proton? Isn't it black enough? But if you give
some energy into it, a little while later, it will eject
this surplus energy from its inside at the outside,
newly quantized, either as radiation or as particle
pairs. After this the balance of the stable "black
hole", of our particle, is equalized. When
you destabilize stable particles successively you will
reach the pre-protocosm state. When you produce a
quantity of such unstable particles that they are
compressed all together, they will make of their
intensity that original state I called the protocosm. A
gigantic unstable particle filled with real unstable
particles. This state is not closed forever. After a
quarter period it has its reversion of its collapse -
its anticollapse. It explodes! These are the small bangs
instead of the "big bang"! GRBs come from
And now let's give the rest to the
present scientists: My protocosms are objects all over
the world, all inside of the centers of celestial
bodies, so inside of galaxy cores and also inside of
star cores. But they are not stationary. The little time
they are collapsing, they get closed and loose their
inside gravity for a short time. After this they come to
an anticollapse. While this process of opening the
inside gravity comes to the outside again and it is
acting there for a another short time. Additionally this
protocosm ejects quantized masses, so subprotocosms.
These bodies are running into the spheres of the core,
and there they are installing new objects, so new and
young stars for example. This is the sex of cores: some
mass and energy come into the core with vibrations; then
the core closes; inside of it an evolution is running
for birth of a new feature of life; then it opens and
ejects the new life into the environment. A birth of
pre-states of life after a process of pre-sex
analogously to ours. After all the central protocosm
eats matter from the environment and gets some special
matter with vibrations and so it is closing with a
collapse for the next short time ... and so on.
Somehow - these are
the processes in the area of stars.
However, the system law covers all
matter! Therefore protocosms are also the reason that
new areas of life are formed from their energy and
the available matter - also areas of organic life.
Consequently, life does not arise. But that way: New
life only arises from lives!
Isn't it nice? And what is like
red shift of background radiation?