you say and what is correct of it.
When I was in
Gondwana Land of the zoo of Leipzig in March 2017 and I
drove a round with the boat with my grandchildren, a
story of the earth sounded from the loudspeakers
provided by pictures which although is wrong in the
items one and three following the solutions of my
theory. The items two and
four originate from the common opinion today why I still
have attached them here. They are not told in the zoo,
however, they belong to this crude conception of the
assertion: In the beginning there was one only bang, the
Big Bang. The universe expands since this moment.
Everything is in extreme escape velocity from each
is absolutely wrong!
is: After the first bang
innumerable further openings followed on different
heights of the cosmos inside its determined radius. The
cosmos absolutely does not expand, but bang for bang a
new matter is unfolded or piled up in it up to the
maximum. So the cosmos refills itself starting out from
the centre and refills with star matter which falls to
each other or also partly escapes from each other - but
the complete cosmos does not expand. There is not a
so-called flight of the galaxies with almost vacuum
Redshift of spectrum would prove the escape of galaxies.
is also absolutely wrong!
is: Space consists of a
system of sub-cosmoses. Their exchanges make the space!
I call the unstable sub-cosmoses "PKs" from a
German word (Protokosmos), English: Protocosm. These PKs
are so to speak "black holes", which are not
completely black and not static but dark grey and
dynamic. They arise and shape everywhere in universe in
not restricted crowd. They contain the basic program of
the universe - a quantization which finds itself again
in each object and each subject. The galaxies are
released from such PKs. They must overcome the gravitational
horizon of this protocosmos bent extremely. During this
way at the beginning of the opening process their light
is shifted extremely into red. The light of the relieved
objects becomes shifted the less red with the further
thinning of the PK density by sputum of matter later.
assertion: The proto-earth cooled down and then the life
arose up from unicellular organisms to multicellular
ones and complex living beings.
is absolutely wrong, too!
is: The whole universe is living! Because it is filled
with PKs of any programmed forms it is producing each
secondary life-forms at arbitrary temperatures. JUST:
Only those life-forms, which are induced by some PKs
survive the environmental conditions which are just
maching. All the other subjects pass as fast as they
were induced. Depending on chance of the conditions
other life-forms then have the chances to spread across
the earth. They did not arise, but they were induced by
the PKs and of the PK-structure-energy, created as they
were made by the hands of God.
consequently is a kind of forward-evolution and never a
transition of "Species" into another one. All
the species independently from each other were induced
by special PKs. Created living beings run into a kind of
evolution within the forward time arrow while they are
in adaption to the conditions.
under living beings are quite natural because the
programmes always produce another nature only by change
of the least shares. However, the mass blocks of the PKs
in their central areas and their special programmes at
the surfaces of the spatial programming do not change
just behave like PKs. This is allknown and wellknown.
today innumerable PKs are buzzing through the space. New
living beings who suit or die out in their environment
conditions are created by the PKs again and again.
is really crazy. No-one could believe this: God
created a human being according to his picture.
This is called according to his program with his
idea of a human. Anyway, there was a plan.
Where? It was made by an energy loaded
program, better by a high-energy hologram.
This is just a protocosm - a holographic program
- a body full of structure energy. These bodies are
regarded to be God's hands. They create human
beings, men and women, in the cosmos everywhere. With
low differences. So I think that mankind did not have a
Big Bang in Africa but also was created by different
protocosms. So also on each planet. Because of the
similar programming, however, people are everywhere at
once and with each other capable of reproduction. Man
consequently did not arise in Africa but
was induced into many parts of the continents or
of the first continent.
assertion: The universe would be flat.
incorrect! We know something like this – concluded
from bare observations – as our Earth was a
is: Ways of light are extremely curved, so that all the
cosmic objects in universe are fundamentally closer to
each other than we can "see" in space! Because
of these light curves the universe is much denser than
subsumed by pure observations.
from a PK is induced or is born a new fix star with its
protoplanets, then at the beginning it is dived in such
a strong red that you suspect it would escape with light
speed. Consequently you think there is an inflation of
universe - an internal faster expansion. But this is not
the case because everything is nearer to each other and
the light is so much shifted to red because of the
extreme gravitation at the horizon of the PKs.
– this is the end of the fundamental faults of today's
My sites: www.eu-charta.com
and Theory www.arcusuniverse.com