Article translated in 10011999
Presently darkness is still expanding
over the phenomena of nature. Especially the theories to the space and to the
matter are more filled of presumptions as of exact science. The unity of all
field theories, a solution for the overall matter, should be created. I myself
as German author Arcus have already found it. However I had to publish my theory
and solutions under the category, "bordersciences", because the
renowned physics are not ready to accept that they have underrun basic mistakes
of terminology of both theories, which huge consequences follow. That means:
Whether Theories of Relativity nor Quantum theory are mathematically wrong. But
both mathematics are wrongly explained today by incorrect models.
I give you a little summary of the
basic thoughts.
This United Field Theory (UFT being IOT)
is based precisely on the fundamental solutions of the original Theories of
Relativity and on the effect quantum h of Max Planck, fewer on the building of
the Quantum theory, which was organized on it. The Quantum theory contains
mistakes in its terminology. You only had to exchange a few words, and Quantum
theory would be new and correct.
So the new theory corresponds to the
found unity of the perception of Einstein, who expected a further solution of
his theories, which should be able to train then the constant h of Planck.
The solution of Friedman includes three
parameters of three solutions until today. I looked at the solution of the
pointed cycloid for a closed cosm. It is able to change it into the rotation of
a unit circle. The pointed cycloid has a harmonic oscillation on half the radius
(the high school students learn such mathematics already).
Following I was interested for the
Black hole, that radius is calculated over r= 2GM/c². The number of 2 had
become relevant. Just now the oscillation radius of R=r/2=GM/c² could be
formed. That solution corresponded best to the nonstationarity of a closed
cosm. The inside mass M is harmonically and spherically oscillating. Until today
nobody thinks of an ideal oscillation of any cosm (so microcosms and the cosmos)
but me. The stringtheory is not this, but a basic thought of vibrant lines. So
it is far away from my thought of an amplitude of any cosm and thus of any
particle.
The Planck quantum h is confessed since
the waves were explained with it. So I put it experimentally thinking into the
formula for an oscillating Black hole and received so the quantity of the
gravity: An each stable cosm, if the universe or if stable particles like
protons and electrons, can be described of the quantity 1h. So the Planck
quantum h came into the Theory of General Relativity.
This solution was refused by the
experts, that I was asking for further help. I was going on about to see, what
well will come out. The result seemed certainly to be nonreal but however it
was very interesting. An oscillating cosm is filled with a huge interior mass M,
but its vibrant sphere does not approximately project the inside coordinate
system to the outside, but the frequency of its sphere, because it has closed
there. Therefore a bigger cosm with its bigger interior mass is oscillating with
a smaller frequency than a smaller cosm. The higher the frequency the bigger the
external mass m respectively the mass of the cosm respectively of the real
particle. Is this a paradoxon: m= d/ M with d= 4.7 x 10^{16} kg²?
I calculated the masses of nucleons m
changing into their masses M (280,000,000,000 kg) and with which gravitational
force they had to force their outside with the inside. I exactly received out
the experimental definite forces in the nucleus. Therefore it could not be a
paradoxon. Now I had to continue. Because the nucleons, that cohesion had not
exactly confessed until now, seemed to force through their inside gravity, in
that they dip their gravitational radius into each other. Maybe all forces are
to explain so and not different over the gravitational and the electromagnetic
forces?
How have to connect two different
solutions of Friedman? First of all I had a solution for stable particles  for
real cosms or stable and oscillating Black holes. I checked now assorted
reactions of the particle physics. With it I found, that the stable particle,
which was destabilized always comes back over a row of particle pairs or parity
energies to the original stable particle. Physicists do not explain it this way.
Rather they remark, that the stable particle forms a new particle, which then
decomposes and with it under a different stable particle of the same type also
originates, which is not the same or not the identical particle (keeping of
baryons or leptons). For it there finally would be no proof.
Here is the logic: If each particle is
not any mass point but a cosm (thats a body having a room!), so it picks up
energy. With it the frequency is increasing and so that radius is decreasing. A
state of the particle is formed, which has more external mass and less internal
mass. At the inside something is going, which is storing the energy and which is
equally ejecting it sometimes, so that the particle is coming back to the
stability. The principle of the physics is beginning to sway, to find the
origins of the elementarity at high energies. Rather the elementarity seems to
be now the stable status of the electrons, the protons and the two stable
neutrinos. Experimental ways to higher energies seem to be senseless.
By the way, the United Field Theory
explains the neutrinos as big neutral microcosms. They have to carry a rest
mass, which was calculated by me.
I calculated for my new constructed
stable proton neutrino 0.01 eV/c². The factor of 2 is depended on the
oscillating sphere of the microcosm. The stable electron neutrino is 1836 times
heavier  so about 20 eV/c². However nonstable muon neutrino carries about 500
keV/c². Certainly one has shown the minimum mass of electron neutrino, but
nobody knows the masses of the other types of neutrinos. Anyhow, estimations of
the mass of electron neutrinos on the base of experiments and observations of
the SN 1987 A found a hypothetical mass between 20 and 10 eV/c².
What condition is the unstable particle
description? The particle is formed from closed and originally stable cosm,
which however opens for its inside excess. Nothing asymmetrical could pass the
horizon. However symmetries of plus and minus of the lambdaterm, like particle
pairs and contrary energies can be sent out. Therefore the unstable particle has
an openness. So the second solution of Friedman has been spoken. The third
solution of the basically opened cosm is missing. Where do we find it into the
closed universe?
I now constructed pair formations per
radiation pressure, which are continuously using the photo energy. The particle
pairs are getting smaller and are storing denser. The environment is getting
colder. The excess at ordinary unstable particles is given. Sufficiently
particles come together, they form an oscillating Black hole of the mass. A
collapse of gravitation has happened. Therefore it locks a mass of parity
matter, where the radiation is wrapped within the destabilized particles and the
plenty of the ordinary unstable particles. During the collapse, it is possible
that particles are collecting themselves at the one hand and antiparticles do so
at the other hand. So they form a twinlike collapse system which is not
symmetric. The energy of that matter is larger than the energy of the
antimatter. This process is also questioned. Physics only believe in a collapse
of stars of cold matter. Please, look here the analogon to my idea: Proton plus
energy give proton plus electron plus positron. While these pair of particles
are formed, they consist of matter and antimatter, they are still so small that
they have place below the horizon of the proton. Therefore we have the example
for such an event.
Until now one is understanding, a Black
hole could not be anticollapsing any more. Alike how you can only reach with
torpid matter a divergence against the vacuumspeed of light (impossible the
waves), I found, that the gravityhorizon r, if it is formed from the outside,
just reaches a divergence. That shows: The horizon r is never reached
completely. Therefore this type of Black holes is relatively still open. However
at 9/8r the collapse begins to the interior.
Black holes, which are formed by a
gravitational collapse of externally observed matter, are never closed
completely, and so they are nonstable. Therefore until now as stationary seen
Black holes are relatively open, whereby they could be White holes at the end.
Those Blackandwhite holes, which are
connected over the relativistic Wormholes, then I called them
"protocosms". They correspond to the third Friedmansolution. In each
stable cosm the protocosms are existing as former of structures. They form out
the portions of the protostructure, whence the net of the galaxyinstallations
is formed. Certainly in the microcosms, microgalaxies are also moving. Again
there are problems in opposition to the prevailing doctrine: 1. The red shift is
not explicable this way, 2. Particles and waves seem to connect, but no longer
they are the same. That means: Lightparticles don't exist, but properties of
lightmomenta and particlemomenta are the same. Lightwaves are flowing momenta
through vacuum. Moved particles origin their momenta and so their
wavecharacter. But particles are microcosms with more volume than a gravity
point could say.
Are big masses wrapped into a
protocosm, so the outsidemass is getting very low. The change is gone from the
outer positive energy to the interior on negative. Such kind of Black holes only
need low momenta to fly off with relativistic speed (near to vacuumspeed of
light). That corresponds to the wormholesolution. Exactly! Someday these
things must pop open even equally, how they have met! The anticollapse runs, if
the inside mass has accomplished in the relativistic timedelayed flight, once
to compress itself and once again to expand. There the hole had never closed
totally. Now it goes over the critical horizon of 9/8r, that radius was decided
by the Theory of General Relativity. On it the horizon has to begin closing
(here also opening). The anticollapse leads to the freesetting of annihilation
energies in extreme magnitudes. With it the galaxy systems or different systems
are installed. Now it is also interesting, that here the origin of the
gammaraybursts are explicable out of the overall system.
Protocosms are climbing up from the
center of their cosm, and they are anticollapsing there (in their interior their
subprotocosms do the same, there the subsubprotocosms do so and so on). In this
moment their momentum is to convert onto the gigantic interiormass, that now is
coming to the outside. That signifies, the just installed systems immediately
stop and only set a low speed under each other. The assertion of an escape of
galaxies is not longer possible. Big bang is also an untrue fiction. Rather it
bangs in portions, therefore quantified.
However this should actually correspond
to the expectations of the quantumgravity! The inside mass of the cosm will be
built up from the center to the amplitude. Its sphere grows during its
oscillation phase up to the amplitude R. The light runs with it. During the
installation time and the elongation to the upside, the mass density is
decreasing. Consequently the light in this connection is getting its red shift.
With the world events the light is running the reduction of the world density
and chills off. So the background radiation refines itself from the central
anticollapsed protocosms. All different protocosms also burst on. In their
inside an own parallelprocess leads to an own background radiation, that now is
relatively warmer. That process is giving the unhomogenities of the background
radiation. Each opening of a protocosm is setting free an annihilation blitz. If
its red shift is low, so it is nearby and not at the "start" of the
universe. If its red shift is stronger as the background radiation, so the
object is not effectively furthermore in opposite to the zero of the universe
oscillation, but relativistically furthermore: The radiation within big
protocosms surrenders out of the anticollapses of their own subprotocosms. That
own radiation red shift of its microworld now still comes into our cosmos, and
so it is subjected there a second time of red shift on their ways through the
dense reduction.
Incidentally an oscillating cosm has
only hypothetical but no real starts and no real ends. The cosm singularity is
also avoided. Or better singularity exists. However it will be denied, so the
protocosms are formed out of the matter, which now is forming the singularity.
Exactly it is called: The matter is packed in quanta in the protocosms, before
it is able to accept a density against infinite. The superlight protocosms in
their totality now are putting the singular condition, a condition, at this the
coordinate system had to be exchanged once again. They take rounds at a central
area of the cosm and then they climb up again. Each protocosm is going through
its inside "singularity" on alike type and manner like the cosm. When
we compute all oscillations to zero, so all cosms and protocosms have their
bypasses at the same time, but never at the same place. So the thing with the
infinite density is brilliantly avoided. Not me have been brilliant here, but
the designer of the universe. This fact I only was confirmed in my belief at
this creator.
About completion of the Friedman
solutions I could accommodate my radiationcosmossolution. Each radiation
energy gets into the closed cosmos. It forms a share at the overall wave energy
of the spacetime, that size corresponds to a Black light hole. The own
attraction of the photons under each other is enough, to close the cosm. At the
place of the observer on a galaxy the strength of the radiation is not to
determine as long as it comes back to him and how a denser becoming bell around
him increases with energy. Then including his system he will be burned back to
the protocosm, and then he will fly a round through the alleged
"wormhole". However there it never goes backwards. Furthermore
nothing will stay, but everything will be rebuilt and orderly ejected. Who is
ever getting accidentally into a protocosm, could have been accused also to the
crocodiles to the grub.
If one gives energy to a stable cosm,
so it is handed over at the protocosms into the inside. Then they fly faster. So
they are not getting so early or only partly to the anticollapse any more. The
inside mass is no longer set free into the original quantity of the inner
protocosms. Therefore now the external mass of the unstable particle is
increasing.
So the basic interaction game is
explained, if there the problem with the waves and the particles would still not
be remained. Now particles are well else no more waves, equally how handy
telephones are not any waves, ought for understanding one had to exchange them
back and forth. Apparently particles are wavereceivers and wavestations!
What things are photons for then, if
they are not any lightparticles? Why have they equally moved like a
wavemomentum particle? Once Einstein had chewed 50 years and nothing found.
Now I simply had to take the
consequences of his solutions. I was not guilty, that the result looked so, how
it even was. Different physicists attempt to spend contradictions into my
solutions over terminology questions. They browse in my book without reading it,
and they find problems with themselves. I can take his right, to introduce a new
terminology during the creation of a new, fully differently systematized theory.
In this book I originate a lonely
photon, so that each person with a realgraduation could understand the thing: A
leaderbow. An electric shock. The rotation of the electric charges at the real
particle forms the magnetic field, whose effectcenter I am describing as a
wavequantum. It is bipolar. Each polarizations into the vacuum are shifted
along, as a corset was formed for the stationary magnetfield, that would be
reaching into the theoretical infinite. The diffusion of this lonely momentum
over the electromagnetic vacuum is named the photon. One could also deliver a
wave of photons, if one would constantly renew the momentum. For example one
waves the leaderbow or rotates it. So the polarizations are rotating along into
the vacuum. Then each observerpoint could observe a consequence of
fluctuations, of which each one represents a photon. A photon therefore is the
expression of electromagnetic energy, that is also transferred or carried of the
diffusion of an electromagnetic field over the vacuum.
In its movement a real particle is
relatively forming a wave quantum, a magnetic field quantum, to the stationary
vacuum. Here two types of wave quanta are born! The rotating charge is giving
the photon. However the rotating mass is building the gravity wave quantum  the
fallon. I did not call it "graviton", because the physics already
understand the graviton as a particle. The fallon is no particle, but the
continuation of the gravitomagnetic field over the gravitational vacuum.
What is vacuum? Einstein had a solution
of the stationary cosm. One has discarded it as nonreal. Why should one
arbitrarily levy or discard the solutions of the General Relativity Theory? I
remark, all of them to join side by side and together to a system. That seems to
be the brainier solution. I couldn't process all solutions. For the start, that
I introduce, it is already enough, to introduce a new view of life.
Einstein gave a lambdaparameter. That
symmetry should sign the matter and the antimatter in equal quantities. The
result was the stationarity. How beautiful! I take the bold conclusion: Lambda
signifies also inertia and antiinertia, weight and antiweight, mass and
antimass. Does anybody already think on it seriously? A particle and an
antiparticle connect itself and vanishes with it in the stationary vacuum as
chargeanticharge, massantimass, magnetantimagnet. What could remain there, if
the particle would not oscillate? Nothing. However two photons remain, the
oscillation energy of the particle pair exactly corresponds to the wave energy.
That means: Cosms are missed in vacuum. For it radiations remain in the vacuum.
The changing is possible with the pair forming of particles and antiparticles
under involvement of radiation and real particles.
A further solution of the General
Relativity Theory (Kerr in 1963) shows, that within the sphere of stationarity
with r the nonstationarity exists  exactly in the ideal event under half the
radius of r with R=r/2. We request, what happens, if matter and antimatter meet
themselves, so we have explained the problem: particle and antiparticle
annihilate. Then they are disappeared. Instead of them the electromagnetic
energy is running in form of two photons around the world. If however photons
are nothing but magnetic attributes, where is the particle and its charge as
cosm respectively as radiationcosm going to then? Exactly! They are connected.
So they exist as vacuumquanta. Neutralized balls, that mass is forming a
gigantic body of plus and minus lambda, the stationary vacuum. It reaches the
gravityhorizon r of the universe. The nonstationarity of the oscillating
matter only reaches until r/2.
Waves of the electromagnetism and of
the gravitomagnetism are running along the vacuumbody. The particles as
disturbances of vacuum can not be moved through the vacuumbody more quickly,
than the protocosms, therefore divergently at the vacuumspeed of light. But
waves are going in this normal vacuum with vacuum speed of light (remark:
now I do not know, if vacuum here is really seen as such a feature, because
pairs of proton neutrinos are all around us; this state may influence the
measurements of light velocity in this novacuum!!!) Step more particles
increasingly into the vacuum, so they disturb it and reduce that density. The
speed of light is actually decreasing in the material media under the
vacuumspeed of light. Could one compress the vacuum now, in that one
practically outwits it with effects of quanta, how the tunnel effect, so the
speed of light of the normal vacuum would increase above. The trick is, to take
off the waves its possibility to continue itself from vacuumquantum to
vacuumquantum directly. They must jump away some quanta, as there were no
vacuum, therefore no spacetime, no metric system. Actually such effects have
measured, however still they are differently explained. Finally one believes
"lightparticles" are able to beam, although they only deal about the
linkage of magnetic energies, those are available connecting allround
(isotropic) in the stationary vacuum. Never is something beamed and never
something will be beamed, by which a wavequantumcondition itself is not
already on the different side, which is excited over the vacuum. Therefore this
is no beaming of real particles, of real cosms, but only a sensitive
transferring of energetic information from wave to wave over the vacuum.
Each moved particle is forming a
wavequantum, the matterwave of De Broglie is explained. However the
wavequantum with its waveamplitude has a definitive distance to the center of
gravity of the rotating particle. Insofar the problems are given, which question
the present interpretations of the quantum theories. Hereupon I went detailed.
That I might not appraise now.
I please the overall system, that
finally will guide us there, that all forces of the nature are collaborating of
the gravity and the electromagnetism. The solution seems to be philosophically
interesting, that the universe is basically oscillating  the matter is
swinging. All appearances are reflecting this. So I remark the unit of all
fields has actually been found.
These are my sites
http://www.arcusuniverse.com
of my theory about World Fomula named IdealOscillatorTheory, just as a variant
of the Unified Field Theory
http://www.eucharta.com
of my social critics at Germany and the European Union
