|
|
Production
of Particles from Nothing of Vacuum but only by pure Energy?
Theses of this physics
- Vacuum fluctuates. It is undulating, during this,
particle-pairs are formed and immediately destroyed in the
context of Heisenberg's uncertainty relation.
- Would sufficient radiation energy come together for two
and more particles, thus pairs could jump from the vacuum.
- Accidentally an energy concentration would have been
formed, for example for the big bang.
- Particle pairs annihilate totally to pure radiation
energy. If here accident would have worked, a few
particles would have been remained.
- This way any particle matter would have been produced by
some energy matter.
Observations and my theses in accordance with my theory:
- In the vacuum the radiant energy seems to be kept,
apparently proved as Casimir's effect? After it between
two metal plates darkness will be increasing the smaller
the distance will be. There the photons get in here
neither about the metal pieces nor from the side. From the
outside momenta of photons may be transferred to the
plates. These two plates will be pressed by them. Thinking
at virtual photons by setting the experiment into a total
Faraday-cage and by cooling it to zero, only a few cold
photons stay. However, wave momenta aren't particles yet!
Such impulses of extremely low energy in the proximity of
the absolute zero don't represent the energy of an
electron pair approximately but only unite little quota
insignificantly. So little energy cannot take the vacuum
pairs of the electrons and positrons to the undoing. The
accident makes this only within extremely long time
periods. However, the observations show short times from
Casimir's experiment. Well, where do the momenta come
from, if not from already available quanta of real waves?
After my theory they don't come from
"vacuum-particles". Virtual particles in
understanding of quantum mechanics are not particles, but
effects of wave quanta (momentum=impulse · distance),
shortly named quanta. For example, these are photons as
well as light quanta of light waves. They are not
particles, anyway, because they have no rest mass, but
only momentum-mass of their wave energy. Though I decide
on waves and particles.
- At the proximity of the absolute zero-point, a photon
has only fractions of an electron volt (eV) from energy.
Producing an electron pair one needs more than one million
eV. Since Heisenberg one believes in the accident of
concentration of energy if time uncertainty would come at
a small value, during energy uncertainty would increase.
This process would give the necessary quantum of energy in
the minimum of the time period in question. Because of the
uncertainty relation, however, the arisen pair should be
destroyed just as fast again. If the complete energy of 1
MeV actually came together, then the vacuum would only
give the pair free. Every observation however is carried
out under such conditions, which cannot be able to exclude
participation of real particles in the pair forming.
- No too long time ago, one only knew pair formings at the
reactions at which particles meet. Energy of the radiation
also could work and form pairs at a particle. So one could
see this process as if the particle like a mother would be
necessary to give birth to the twins of particles. The
energy however behaves like food and seed of the event.
There are actually momentum collisions. But particles do
not collide themselves. They cannot! Their wavequanta do
it! Consequently collisions of photons or/ and fallons can
make real particle pairs from pure vacuum.
The assertion, the vacuum would have given birth to the
particle pairs without participation of an already
available particle, therefore cannot be proved. It is more
improbable, if after my theory it is valid: Each
particle is a geometrical microcosm. Its concept is
programmed and especially separated into quanta. Vacuum
but consists from dissolved particles in primary
subparticles, which are the smallest and the heaviest
particles of universe - but also original particles with
the highest energy. Forming these particles as pairs we
would need more than 1015 GeV. From nothing
will be nothing. Now my theses follow to the existence of
magons and antimagons which are light-cosms, which are
storing the structures of the particles and antiparticles
in vacuum. This is the way to realize it, that these
light-cosms are the "photocopier". After my
theory it is not possible, that any big bang is coming
alone from an energy vacuum, because a single magon-pair
is at least missing there, which at the beginning has been
able to play the mother to reproduce the clones. A
magon-pair but is the result of annihilation. Consequently
at the beginning of all there must be active a creative
program.
- Result: Hawking's theory of big bang from a quantum foam
of wave quanta, charged with radiation energy (who knows
where this one comes here now again, it doesn't come from
annihilation of particle pairs), is an illusion. It tells
us the same question: What was well first there, the hen
or the chick? In addition, it clears nothing: Particles
cannot formed out from a quantum foam, if there isn't
already some real particle. Accidentally they cannot break
symmetries. Such a theory of quantum mechanics is based on
the believe in an accident. A cause for asymmetrical
particle reactions is not found yet, which could give a
clear explanation. But this time scientists simply know
too less. Only the accident helps them now to be
satisfied, that there was not God. Accident should make a
pact with the devil, according to the religions. If
therefore not God, then rather the devil! What a science!
- Quantum foam one sets in the beginning and one sees it
as the nothing. Really why do they this? Don't you know,
that quanta but wave quanta are formed then, if charges or
particles are moved? There so-called electromagnetic wave
quanta are formed out - the photons. In addition, the
quanta of "matter-waves" are formed. There must
be particles to form quanta. Isn't it funny? All
scientists turn around in their circles. Until today no
explanation is such a brilliant one, that one should have
the scientist lived highly. It always runs out on the same
rubbish: One looks for a beginning. I don't look for it
any more because it doesn't have to be found. My
oscillation theory yields the solution of the dilemma
which however doesn't answer the question after the
beginning satisfactorily:
- If something oscillates like a clock pendulum, who will
ever say, when, under which conditions and from whom
pendulum was pushed at the first time? Well, nobody can do
it. Pendulum would have been pushed the first time under
each of arbitrary time and under arbitrary circumstances.
So to every time there were real particles, vacuum, wave
quanta and the total system of their relations after the
laws. However, somebody seriously asks, who could have
designed everything like a watch and who has put it in
walk then, one only finds this answer of religions: God.
If he doesn't want to ask, then he can live thus well in
this eternal oscillation!
My site:
https://www.arcusuniverse.com |
|
|