Essential Features of Union of both Theories
Until today one thinks:
1. The General Relativity Theory (GRT) would be only a theory
of gravitation for the macrocosm.
2. The Quantum Mechanics (QM) would only be a theory for the
atomic and subatomic area. Particles would be like points. Only their origin
would lay in "strings". Wave nature of matter especially comes from
dual nature of particles and waves. Heisenberg's uncertainty relation was
interpreted as: Position and momentum of the particle would not be concerned
simultaneously with perfect accuracy. Born gave conclusion: The square of the
amplitude would be a measurement of the probability of the particle-residence.
Concluding this, we see the particle equal to a wave. At last
both got to one. One speaks about light particles and light waves as well as of
electrons and electron-waves. The particle and its momentum were bound to one
1. GRT: Because of Friedman-solution there are opened, closed
and mixed cosmoses of gravitation, of electromagnetic radiation and of both
gravitation and ray.
It follows: GRT is valid for all kinds of cosmoses from mass
and from electromagnetism. One should find further cosmoses to the macrocosm. I
postulated and researched that result positively: Each cosmoses are oscillating
harmonically, if they are closed. They exchange wave-quanta (impulses like
momenta, quanta). Therefore they are sending and receiving stations of
electromagnetic or/and gravity waves.
My logic hypothesis: Also microcosms are taken to this.
Therefore particles do not only have a mass point or a charge point. They
oscillate into the space. Following they are not only "strings" at any
beginning of matter, but the complete matter is oscillating! Only this way
matter is able to origin and to exchange wave quanta. In this respect particles
are primary quanta. They oscillate after Planck-constant. So the complete matter
consists of oscillating black holes. Is the matter stable, these holes are
black; is it unstable, holes are open sometimes or open. Black holes change to
white holes, but not in billions of years, but in split seconds! That is the
base of my explanations of matter of macro- and of microcosm.
2. QM should change now some words of its terminology. This
would be its loose. The win was given in the unity with the above shown
oscillator-solution of GRT. What is important?
a) Particles are no points anymore now. They have an expansion
b) The mass point of a particle, which is always moving on
curved lines (GRT), originates the quantum respectively the momentum and the
amplitude of the wave of the particle.
c) The amplitude of the particle wave does not lay congruently
to the radius of particle-movement. The radius of particle-movement is not equal
to the amplitude of its wave.
d) Heisenberg new: Amplitude and momentum of particle-wave are
not concerned simultaneously with perfect accuracy. The uncertainty relation is
not yet related now at the position of the particle, because this position is
absolutely not able to indicate. Reason: Only interactions of momenta are
able to indicate, and these are interactions of wave quanta! If any
quantum physicist could accept this, we would be far at the top.
e) Born new: The square of amplitude of particle wave or a
wave itself is a measurement for the probability of interactions of wave
quanta. Thus particles do not interact themselves, but their wave quanta do
this, their momenta do so, far away from the particles. The higher the
relativistic speed of indication, the more interaction is coming near to the
gravity point of the particle itself. This way it is yet meeting the
subparticles before, which are in this particle moving. So the particle, that
position, is never able to indicate.
f) Matter now has no dual nature of particle and wave, but unity
nature of wave quantum and wave respectively of momentum and wave
(wave properties do not include any contradiction).
What is the problem? Originally, one thought in classic sense,
momentum would belong into the physical body directly respectively into the
body. It seems to be so in macroscopic areas, even though there already the
interaction both of bodies with their momenta is laying beneath the gravity
point too. The difference is such a small one at non-relativistic speeds that it
can be ignored. Just this one should not do anymore thinking on unity of both
The momentum is not a direct part of the position of the
particle but of the position of the interaction!
This is the decision! If quantum theorists would come along
with me, there was nothing lost, but everything won - the united view at the
None of the theories is wrong. No work of physics was for
nothing! Only some words were put newly. A few relations were new. And the work
of matter can be seen in a different light. Of cause, these consequences are
Any further discuss?