Basic Problems
Hitherto existing opinion is caused on theory of
probability. Statistics were becoming to a part of reality,
for example: electron dust above a nucleus, chicken dust above
Germany (because every German eats one chicken per week).
Should statistics be real? I say, it is a crutch of science.
First, they haven't yet a knowledge about reality. Second, they
will never determine reality but statistics because of
processes, which are hardly to understand like tunnel effect.
Dual nature of matter leads to a unit of waves and
particles. Written this kind, it might be right. Waves equally
set to particles, but is wrong, so wrong is the word and the fact
of "light-particle". Theories say, particles would
be distributed to dust or "sand". The subparticles
of this dust would reach the infiniteness - the particle as a
common function of probability.
But this is a function of wave interactions, really! Cosms
themselves would have no outer interaction, if they would not
move in a closed system of movements - in a hierarchy of
cosms. Moving charge and mass gives two features of wavequanta:
1. Electromagnetism, 2. Gravitomagnetism.
Wavequanta are the hands on the arms of microcosms.
Instead, they would have no medium to contact each other. The
position r of interaction of the wavequantum at another wavequantum is caused by Planck's condition
nħ = m
v r /
Because waves carry a momentum (an impulse) like moved
particles also do it, physics think waves are particles. But
this is better: Particle movements origin their impulses (their
momenta, their wavequanta).
Running impulses inthrough there are the things called
waves resp. wavequanta. So there is a dual nature of
impulses, not of particles and waves: Momenta of particles
are the same as free running impulses of waves. Light
particles do not exist - light impulses of waves exist (wavequanta
as photons). Impulses of light react like impulses of
particles and with impulses of particles own, in that
particles are moved from light. Stationary vacuum, I found, is
a state containing all the stable particles of this world in
parity. That means parities of charge-anticharge,
mass-antimass, impulse-antiimpulse (momentum-antimomentum).
The result is zero of property, an ideal medium, ideal fluid,
a fluidum even and alone for particles, their charges and
their impulses!
Is there one proton in vacuum, each parities of it have to
be separated along the law of 1/r². This is the electric
field - the real polarization of vacuum-quanta into the
theoretical infiniteness. Do you turn the proton to circle,
the polarization of the vacuum is running (winding) along.
This is the magnetic field - a rotation polarization of
vacuum-quanta. Each second proton would now get a new movement
because of the interaction of both fields, of both protons. We have static
and rotating fields of electrity (electrition) and of gravity
(gravitation).
Below to these secondary wavequanta, there are primary
exchange quanta of the speed of c between the primary forces
of the particles. This is due to the oscillation of the
particles. This operation has misled the quantum mechanics to
this day. Particles are Oscillators, Resonators.
If you have a tiltable photon (it is like a pyramid
standing on its top), the smallest impulse can turn it. A
second photon, which has no contact to the first, could turn it, too. This experiment should prove the possibility
of beaming
particles, they think. I say: It is nonsense. They think, the
tunnel effect would have sent particles. But think on
polarization of vacuum-quanta. One running photon is not one
line without any metrical dimension! This one is a
concentrated polarization of vacuum. On its way, this photon is
carrying its polarization besides. This photon vacuum field
was connecting the tiltable photon and turning it around. No
beaming, no particle transmission! If my theory is right,
particles are spherically limited microcosms. They have an
oscillating diameter. But they are no waves - they are
broadcasting and receiving stations. Because of their free
movement in vacuum, every exchange of sent and received wavequantum gives an impulse exchange and so a new movement of the
microcosm. So a cosm and his primary waves are connected with
themselves. Never a cosm or the cosmos (like universe) are
statistically distributed into dust of subparticles, which
would cause the tunnel effect.
Rather, the exchanged primary wavequanta
between the cosms are the origin of an interaction field
around each particle. This field contains the quanta to
contact the next particle before getting together. This way, there is no possibility
of measurements of microcosms
directly. If you shot charged particles together, the electromagnetic
interaction would sign the picture of the
"particle", which is not even this itself.
Consequently, you
can't see an atomic nucleus really, you can't measure a radius
of a proton (e. m. given as 0.8 fm = 8·10-16 m,
but the real oscillation sphere radius is calculated by me to R =
2.1·10-16 m).
If you increase the energy of interacting
electron-wavequanta to a proton on more than 940 MeV,
you will have interactions with the charges of the
subparticles, which are closed below the Radius R. There are
many kinds them with negative charge and one more than
this number with positive charge, result: one positive
elementary charge.
This cloud of subparticles in a proton (I called them
protocosms) physics called it "polarization of
vacuum" wrongly. You see, how quick wrong thesis can
determine wrong theories: They think, the real subparticles to
"vacuum effects", but the wavequanta interactions
between particles they think to a "dust of
subparticles". This mix up in nuclear science has to be
ordered before a united look is possible. That seems to be my
profession.
If you understand this momentum-problem that
particles cannot be indicated but only their interaction momenta, which
are the result of their wave-property, so Heisenberg's
principle of uncertainty relation is not the problem between the position
of the particle and its momentum, but the problem between the
position of the wavequantum interaction and its momentum
(this is a unity of waves only!!), tell me your opinion.
Particles are mini-cosms. You cannot contact them during
contacting their radii. That would be nonsense. You also
cannot contact the central gravity point. Then you had to run
with light speed (near the centre of Black Hole). Thus, each
contact is an interaction between the momentum itself of each
moved cosm.
If nobody could understand this small difference, I could
let it be.
