Home

ARCUS:  The World Formula and its Solutions

Consequently constructed using the results of Albert Einstein and Max Planck leading to the Unified Field Theory

 
Articles
The Preaching
 
 
 
 
  
Have you ever Electrons seen?

A physicist would say: "Isn't Arcus stupid? Now the electrons are seen in their orbit and Arcus claimed that our theories to this aren't the reflection of the reality anyway."

Colin J Humphreys: "Electrons seen in orbit ", 21-22,

nature 2 September 1999

Even worse, I am less mindless, I split hair. Why do I so?

Wave functions are undoubtedly functions of the interactions of waves, particularly of the electromagnetic waves, anyway. The theories are o.k. The results are o.k. But the terminology isn't o.k. So I think.

Hairsplittingly, I have separated the particles from the waves (wavequanta) in my theory (TBA I, II, III, IV, V) and described a new coherence between particles and wavequanta in their appearances. Particles are transmitters and receivers (resonators) of wavequanta. Therefore, they don't have to be the same as their interaction fields of wavequanta.

In my theory, I show this difference again and again, because a particle is a spatial cosmos that has a true dimension which isn't divisible (electron radius: 3.7e-13 m). The electron therefore cannot have spread out into such strange wave spaces more than its radius.

The electron consequently isn't some powder in the s-orbital around the atomic nucleus. It rotates calmly on its flat orbit around the atomic nucleus in which it interacts with wavequanta. The result of the interaction of the electron with the X-ray is the subscription of the spherical orbital.

The p-orbital isn't either a degenerated s-orbital. Interactions of the wavequanta of several electrons yield superimpositions (interferences) and show us a typical picture in the space. Into this cohesion, however, the electron doesn't fly as degenerated dust and it is not there directly.

Therefore nobody has seen the electron. One will never get it for face, too. Perhaps, one finally has "seen" or detected the interaction hits of the electron wavequanta. But this is also not quite correct, because the effects still had to get pictorially in a simulation of the computer.

The result was the illustration interaction spaces of wavequanta of the copper oxide.

The general conception of the wave functions was confirmed with great deviations of the chemical understanding of bonding. The electrons don't couple, but only the interaction spaces of the superimposed matter waves, wavequanta, do it, however.

https://www.arcusuniverse.com/

https://www.no-quarks.com

 

 

 
 
· All rights reserved: Arcus (Heinz-Joachim Ackermann, since1998) ·