Hello
to all freaks who shatter themselves their heads about what
the world holds well together in the innermost!
1.One of the most important
questions currently is the so-called start of the universe,
although not a few are seriously thinking about it, if there
ever has been a start as such a one.
2. Furthermore you ask for:
How far does the matter reach?
3. How is the system of the
matter composed actually?
Surely into the retinue of these riddles,
more and more questions will be told. First of all, I rather want to
finish asking, but to view this four problems and to discuss them.
1. Einstein, as a Jew and faithful in a
Creator, looked into his relativity-theories, the Special and
the General Relativity Theory, to find an advanced sense of
matter - he looked for that formula what should explain
every material state. One calls it unpretentiously "the world
formula" and thinks, behind it there ought to be
something huge or very mystic. However, it is nothing different
than some equations derived from the General
Relativity Theory, which describe the system of matter like a photo. Basic field equations of that theory are the
World Formula themselves! Einstein didn't know this, and today
scientists searching without knowing this.
A photo is not a movie. On it, nothing is
moving. From one single thing, you had to conclude to the following states. That reason, they haven't seen the world
formula, although Einstein have had it in a type of pre-state.
Formula is hidden behind the solutions of the General
Relativity Theory.
With something philosophical understanding,
you recognize in the terms of these equations forming an
oscillation condition, an oscillator being in movement. That
condition you can better describe mathematically and then you
have one of the world formulae. How could it be explained,
now?
We deduce from this, the oscillator was the
ultimatum of the matter, practically a body, that had a
pulsating attribute. If one would clone the content of the
formula, it would be in the company of many oscillators (from
theoretically infinite solutions). All bodies had a relative
movement to each other and consequently, they had the
well-known relative speed. They communicated together, in that
they exchanged the quanta of their waves. If enough of these
bodies would meet, then they will form an oscillator of a new
hierarchical area that will close a bell of the community
above it.
This assumption necessarily leads to see a
content behind each oscillator, that will exist out of
sub-oscillators. The matter would be then like a hierarchical
system of moved clocks, how Einstein always compared so
beautifully, without noticing how near he actuality was to
the reality. The clocks were packed in a hyper-clock. Each
clock includes sub-clocks. We will concrete it: The universe
as mother-oscillator included particles as oscillators. Each
particle is included by sub-particles. All these cosms were
founded on the principle of the Oscillating Black White Hole. This principle still nobody knows actually.
Therefore it is a reason of more, to speak about that
possibility.
Can you not spin the thought of the order of
oscillators until eternity? However it was cute to accept,
outside the universe was a world full of universes put
together into a still bigger oscillator and confidentially at
the inside the sub-particles went this infinity like running
above. Then there was an unimaginable gigantic creature
outside the universe and there would be mini-persons in the
protons on micro-galaxies. In an infinity of the projection it
ought to be so. Was God this giant? No, God made the universe
as an ideal oscillator between ordinary matter and
antimatter in supersymmetry of a twin-body. On the one side,
there are galaxies of matter, on the other side they are
from antimatter, completely 1:1.
However God should have created the universe
world. But a component of this world with the well-known
attributes could not create the matter. Consequently, this
giant was not the creator. Or the giant doesn't exist, and the
Creator is not a feature of this matter, more an existing
hyper-nature. How wide does the matter actually reach, I show
in the answer on the second question.
Doesn't an oscillator show the fact, that
there is neither a start nor an end inside? We watch a
pendulum-clock and we try to answer the question: Who has
given the first push to the clock, when and in which situation
of the pendulum at the first time? Do you participate at such
a discussion without sense?
That event still was not understood. I tell
you:
If the world works like an ideal oscillator, then
nobody could answer the question of the start. It is only
possible, free to Einstein, to put relative starts and ends as
cover points. For example, one could choose the deepest point
of the vibration as zero. So its ascension to the reversion
point and the ensuing descent to the zero is an evolution
phase that repeats itself - it's half a period. The
repetition on the relatively different side leads to the
complete period and its repetition.
We would ask: How has the universe looked as
the zero-point has been valid, and how does it develop itself
upward then and again downward to this zero? Is zero really
zero matter or zero area? Or deal it to itself at the zero
only about a mathematical description of the movement like at
the pendulum. If the pendulum is rushing the deepest but on
the most quickly through the clock, it is not missing! If we
introduce quiet simply, that the whole matter of the universe
is going to the same center of gravity, it's going around
there and it's rising again, so we had found the infinite
evolutionary series, of that Einstein suspected, the matter
ran on a spiral into the future.
Who however has pushed the clock? This
question remains unanswered. One could ignore them and remark,
the world already would run eternally this way, it will also
run further that way. It is uninteresting, to ask something
so. We persons ask with pleasure. Confidentially, we also find
such thinkers who devise answers. The only answer is: If one
clock like the space must be pushed and provided with an
energy, so that it is running, then at the outside of the
universe something or someone must be there, that also
organizes the universe and that provides it with the physical
magnitudes and that has pushed it for first time. This
Something that doesn't work like the universe, that
however exists from the same primordial substance like the
universe, that would be the Creator. Herein a certain logic
lies.
2. This logical consequence only works
completely, if you accept no infinite hierarchy of the
oscillators or of the cosms. The universe was consequently the
body created of the outside world. Then, the sub-particles will
not be direct projections of the particles. They also wouldn't
contain sub-sub-particles but the primordial substance that the
Creator had used to the purposes of the building up.
The concept of the substance is a problem.
If namely without definition the substance would be the same
as the primordial original substance and as the matter, then we were at the
logic-point of above. Also then God, existing out of matter,
could not have created the world, because he will develop
himself with it.
However what is the real substance actually?
The chemists speak about substances. They
start with the chemical elements and put them together
creating the chemical compounds. We have consequently a world
of the substances, the chemical substances. Remarking
historically you always see that all the material would be
real somehow, therefore it would be directly a substance, so
like you see it. In this hope, the hypothesis was born, the
atoms of the elements are no longer able to be split. You
would have find now the elementary substance finally. That
corresponded to the simple perceptions of the matter.
With the division of the atoms the mischief
in opposite to the substance-concept took its course. The
concept of the substance until today was virtually destroyed.
Therefore, scientists even believe in the non-reality of the
matter (I remark, that has only justified as long as one
doesn't have any different mathematical models; furthermore I
come). Particles are waves, and waves are particles, so they
think. That
description of the Quantum Theory merges into a completely
unintelligible mathematical structure that one attributes to
be an unreal model. The most important thing is that there is
altogether a model. One discusses about non-realities and
works themselves hot at the extension of mathematical miracle
factories. How we have now this negative stand in opposite to
the reality? To answer, we further investigate the matter to
interior.
3. Nuclei particles - nucleons - are forming
the atoms. These are protons and neutrons. Above the nuclei,
the electrons are rotating in the shell. Well, we think it's
final. There should be the elementary substances! What however
do they do? To form out the substance "atom", they
all are in rotating movements. The atoms of a chemical
substance or of the chemical compounds never rest. If we would
finish the rotations of the electrons, we found the substance
no longer, but bare atom nuclei. For the forming of a
substance itself law wise moved bodies are finding together.
These bodies are called elementary - namely subatomic
particles.
The elementarity of this type was finished
as one found interactions in the protons that allowed to
conclude on sub-particles, at first they were called partons.
Interactions appear between the quanta of the waves. Because
until now they see wave-properties and particle-attributes
united, they called the interactive quanta "quarks"
later, and they found a filled collection of most different
interactions. Are these "quarks" elementary now?
After all "they" move within the protons. Let us
accept, what many people already accept and what they want to
prove: The "quark" of the matter again is formed out
of moved structures. Maybe, is the end reached, finally? The only
problem is, that we could not pursue this end no longer
directly. We are just missing the energy for such an
experiment. Certainly, an end should be there well.
That fact has its origin in the quanta
forming of the matter. In 1900 Max Planck discovered the
effect-quantum. The consequence of that existence is that not
each world, if the micro-world or the universe, could be the
direct projection. At the inside of particles, it doesn't
equally look like here, if it was extremely reduced. In a
proton the relations are completely different to quantitative
and therefore qualitative situations.
But if we pursue the movement of each
structures, so we see a definition of the matter, like it was
never given before: The matter exists because of relative
movements of moved movements, those are moved themselves - an
only back and forth. Behind all the matter an origin thing is
put that had been moved. This origin thing one could call the
real-substance (primodial substance), that diverse movement first is doing this what we call a "substance" - the matter until now.
You could see it also this way: In that the
real-substance moves itself, the moved pictures originate those components we are. Though we are no substance. We are
movements. We are froth! Who has moved it? One or several,
that or those at the outside of the matter (which is a
froth-blister) is formed by the real-substance on a different
manner as this matter!
If this logic is correct, then there is the
Creator or the Creator's world of real-substances!
Then the matter is installed by the
vibrantly moved real-substances in final repetition sections.
And then the mind is formed by non-vibrant real-substances
moving in infinite and free sections. Then the soul eternally
lives like God and his universe.
This also means: While we are thinking this
process is moving matter. These movements are reflected into
the matter. For example, one speaks about his thoughts. But if
at the inside of each particle and its sub-particles in the
end, the moved real-substance itself is moving along the
movements of thinking additionally, then this real-substance
also draws its own picture into the Creator's empire -
obviously, this is the soul as a non-material phenomenon.
This was the reason of the dispute about the
concepts psyche and soul. The psyche is able to be researched,
because one could observe the material processes of the
nerves. Everything that is not researchable is existing at the
outside of matter, in the soul. Psyche is hardware of the
person: brain, nerves, electric charges and interactions,
chemical substances, like save-substances etc. At the psyche,
the picture is stored to indoors like the knowledge to the
brain etc.
In the soul the picture is stored to the
outside of matter. We have normally no contact with it. Not
the soul is sick, but the psyche if there ever is something
sick. Not soul-doctors, but psychiatrists! The history has
shown, that the translation of the concept "soul"
into the Greek and of that drainage as "psyche" has
no longer remained of that one went out. That has gone
equally crooked like the assumption of the elementary
substance! Psyche is no longer the same as the Soul, and particle is
no longer an elementary-substance.
If it was like we told, then
these facts will be valid:
The world is born, lives and dies. Then
it will be reborn, lives and dies - an unfinished
consequence of oscillation periods under the less changed
conditions.
If the world would be going this way,
why shouldn't do its sub-structures the way like this?
Birth, death, rebirth? Nothing on equal but on alike ways.
Does it remember disagreeably or
agreeably to the religions? Why should not especially
clever and mental bright sighted persons have recognized that the world is such a one before you could postulate
it mathematically? Did prophets know more of the reality?
There would be a Creator-world no matter
like it might be looking.
An "original" and single big bang was
non-real. At the zero point, the matter had run a
different but obvious material and real condition for a
short time.
Each zero is movable. So anytime in the
universe a heaven-body or a different phenomenon of the
matter can run through its relative zero and then it will
be reborn. For example, if you think on the supernova.
The matter was a closed and a programmed
system with programs to freedom-degrees that will lead to
a low effect of accidents.
The big bang at the zero is described
today as chaotic start. That won't be correct however,
because the relative start already had a system of order.
The energies set free from immense magnitudes did not come
from an overall-big-bang, but from an immeasurable
multiplicity of matter-conversions, those have run at
determined but each other distant places. I call them
Small Bangs.
So that the quanta-forming of the
gravity was explained certainly. Practically, the mass of
the universe was set free in portions and remained
eternally in determined portions that will never unite
itself altogether.
Such a model pulls very much consequences to
itself, those are here still not mentioned at all. It
shouldn't remain non-discussed. Otherwise we only remain the
alternative:
The universe was originated from the chaos
of more inexplicable or more speculative pre-states per
accident and developed accidentally, with it extended without
aim, to cool about aimless in the eternity of the expansion to
the rigidity - a unique, accidental and eternal process
without sense, standing in the only few isles of an accidental
and without aim formed sense. Its description with the
Quantum Theory finally would lead to non-real
condition-models. Who pleases actually such a philosophical
handicap of the research? Some psychiatrists will say:
"Whoever lives following such principles is psychically
sick."
Is the whole world crazy today? 06-01-1999
completed: 01-17-2001.
https://www.arcusuniverse.com/
https://www.no-quarks.com
|