Hello to all freaks, those shatter themselves their heads about
what the world holds well together in the innermost!
1.One of the most important questions
presently is the so-called start of the universe, although not a few are
seriously thinking about it, if there ever has been a start as such a one.
2. Furthermore you ask for: How far does the
3. How is the system of the matter composed
Surely into the retinue of these riddles, more and more
questions will be told. First of all I want to finish asking, to view this four
problems and to discuss them.
1. Einstein, as a Jew and faithful at a creator, looked into
his relativity-theories, the Special and the General Relativity Theory, to find
an advanced sense of the matter - he looked for that formula, what should
explain every state. One calls it unpretentiously "the world formula"
and thinks, behind it there ought to be something huge or very mystic. However
it is nothing different than some equations, derived from the General
Relativity Theory, which describe the system of the matter like a photo. Basic
field equations of that theory are the World Formula themselves! Einstein didn't
know this, and today scientists searching without knowing this.
A photo is not a film. On it, nothing is moving. From one
single thing you had to conclude for the following states. That reason they
haven't seen the world formula, although Einstein have had it in a type of
pre-state. Formula is hidden behind the solutions of the General Relativity
With something philosophical understanding you recognize in
the terms of these equations forming an oscillation condition, an oscillator
being in movement. That condition you can better describe mathematically and
then you have one of the world formulae. How could it be explained, now?
We deduce from this, the oscillator was the ultimatum of the
matter, practically a body, that had a pulsating attribute. If one would clone
the content of the formula, it would be in the company of many oscillators (from
theoretically infinite solutions). All bodies had a relative movement to each
other and consequently, they had the well-known relative speed. They
communicated together, in that they exchanged the quanta of their waves. If
enough of these bodies would meet, then they will form an oscillator of a new
hierarchical plane, that will close a bell of the community above it.
This assumption necessarily leads to see a content behind each
oscillator, that will exist out of sub-oscillators. The matter would be then
like a hierarchical system of moved clocks, how Einstein always compared so
beautifully, without noticing, how near he actuality was to the reality. The
clocks were packed in a hyper-clock. Each clock includes sub-clocks. We will
concrete it: The universe as mother-oscillator included particles as
oscillators. Each particle is included by sub-particles. All these cosms were
founded on the principle of the oscillating black-white hole. This principle
still nobody knows actually. Therefore it is a reason of more, to speak about
Can you not spin the thought of the order of oscillators until
eternity? However it was cute to accept, outside the universe was a world full
of universes put together into a still bigger oscillator and confidentially at
the inside the sub-particles went this infinity like running above. Then there
was an unimaginable gigantic creature outside the universe and there would be
mini-persons in the protons on micro-galaxies. In an infinity of the projection
it ought to be so. Was God this giant?
However God should have created the universe world. But a
component of this world with the well-known attributes could not create the
matter. Consequently this giant was not the creator. Or the giant doesn't exist,
and the creator is not a form of this matter, more an existing hyper-nature. How
wide does the matter actually reach, I show in the answer on the second
Doesn't an oscillator show the fact, that there is neither a
start nor an end inside? We watch a pendulum-clock and we try to answer the
question: Who has given the first push to the clock, when and in which situation
of the pendulum at the first time? Do you participate at such a discussion
Event still was not understood:
If the world works like an oscillator, then nobody could
answer the question to the start. It is only possible, free to Einstein, to put
relative starts and ends as cover points. For example one could choose the
deepest point of the vibration as zero. So its ascension to the reversion point
and the ensuing descent to the zero is an evolution phase, that repeats itself -
it's half a period. The repetition on the relatively different side leads to the
complete period and its repetition.
We would ask: How has the universe looked as the zero-point
has been valid, and how does it develop itself upward then and again downward to
this zero? Is zero really zero matter or zero area? Or deal it to itself at the
zero only about a mathematical description of the movement like at the pendulum.
If the pendulum is rushing the deepest but on the most quickly through the
clock, it is not missing! If we introduce quiet simply, that the whole matter of
the universe is going to the same center of gravity, it's going around there and
it's rising again, so we had found the infinite evolutionary series, of that
Einstein suspected, the matter ran on a spiral into the future.
Who however has pushed the clock? This question remains
unanswered. One could ignore them and remark, the world already would run
eternally this kind, it will also run further that way. It is uninteresting, to
ask something so. We persons ask with pleasure. Confidentially we also find such
thinkers who devise answers. The only answer is: If one clock like the space
must be pushed and provided with an energy, so that it is running, then at the
outside of the universe something or someone must be there, that also organizes
the universe and that provides it with the physical magnitudes and that has
pushed it for first time. This Something, that so doesn't work like the
universe, that however exists from the same origin-substance like the universe,
that would be the Creator. Herein a certain logic lies.
2. This logical consequence only works completely, if you
accept no infinite hierarchy of the oscillators or of the cosms. The universe
was consequently the body created of the outside world. The sub-particles will
be then no direct projection of the particles. They also wouldn't contain
sub-sub-particles but the origin-substance, that the Creator had used to the
purposes of the building up.
The concept of the substance is a problem. If namely without
definition the substance would be the same as the origin-substance and as the
matter, then we were at the logic-point of above. Also then God, existing out of
matter, could not have created the world, because he will develop himself with
However what is the substance actually?
The chemists speak about substances. They start with the
chemical elements and put them together creating the chemical compounds. We have
consequently a world of the substances, the chemical substances. Remarking
historically you always see, that all the material would be real somehow,
therefore it would be directly a substance, so like you see it. In this hope the
hypothesis was born, the atoms of the elements are no longer able to be split.
You would have find now the elementary substance finally. That corresponded to
the simple perceptions of the matter.
With the division of the atoms the mischief in opposite to the
substance-concept took its course. The concept of the substance until today was
virtually destroyed. Therefore scientists even believe in the non-reality of the
matter (I remark, that has only justified as long as one doesn't have any
different mathematical models; furthermore I come). Particles are waves, and
waves are particles. That description of the quantum theory merges into a
completely unintelligible mathematical structure, that one attributes to be an
unreal model. The most important thing is that there is altogether a model. One
discusses about non-realities and works themselves hot at the extension of
mathematical miracle factories. How we have now this negative stand in opposite
to the reality? To answer, we further investigate the matter to interior.
3. Nuclei particles - nucleons - are forming the atoms. These
are protons and neutrons. Above the nuclei the electrons are rotating in the
shell. Well we think it's final. There should be the elementary substances! What
however do they do? To form out the substance "atom" they all are in a
rotating movements. The atoms of a chemical substance or of the chemical
compounds never rest. If we would finish the rotations of the electrons, we
found the substance no longer, but bare atom nuclei. For the forming of a
substance itself law wise moved bodies are finding together. These bodies are
called elementary - namely subatomic particles.
The elementarity of this type was finished as one found
interactions in the protons, that allowed to conclude on sub-particles, at first
they were called partons. Interactions appear between the quanta of the waves.
Because until now they see wave-properties and particle-attributes united, they
called the interactive quanta "quarks" later, and they found a filled
collection of most different interactions. Are these "quarks"
elementary now? After all "they" move within the protons. Let us
accept, what many people already accept and what they want to prove: The
"quark" of the matter again is formed out of moved structures. Maybe
is then the end, finally? The only problem is, that we could not pursue this end
no longer directly. We are just missing the energy for such an experiment.
Certainly an end should be there well.
That fact has its origin in the quanta forming of the matter.
In 1900 Max Planck discovered the effect-quantum. The consequence of that
existence is, that not each world, if the micro-world or the universe, could be
the direct projection. At the inside of particles it doesn't equally look like
here, if it was extremely reduced. In a proton the relations are completely
different to quantitative and therefore qualitative situations.
But if we pursue the movement of each structures, so we see a
definition of the matter, like it was never given before: The matter exists
because of relative movements of moved movements, those are moved themselves -
an only back and forth. Behind all the matter an origin thing is put, that had
been moved. This origin thing one could call the real-substance, that diverse
movement first is doing this, what we call a "substance" - the matter
You could see it also this way: In that the real-substance
moves itself, the moved pictures originate, those components we are. Though we
are no substance. We are movements. We are froth! Who has it moved? One or
several, that or those at the outside of the matter (which is a froth-blister)
is formed by the real-substance on a different manner as this matter!
If this logic is correct, then there is the Creator or the
Then the matter is installed by the vibrantly moved
real-substance in final repetition sections. And then the mind is formed by
non-vibrant real-substance moving in infinite and free sections. Then the soul
eternally lives like God.
This also means: While we are thinking this process is moving
matter. These movements are reflected into the matter. For example one speaks
about his thoughts. But if at the inside of each particle and its sub-particles
in the end the moved real-substance itself is moving along the movements of
thinking additionally, then this real-substance also draws its own picture into
the Creator's empire - obviously this is the soul as a non-material phenomenon.
This was the reason of the dispute about the concepts psyche
and soul. The psyche is able to be researched, because one could observe the
material processes of the nerves. Everything that is not researchable is
existing at the outside of matter, in the soul. Psyche is hardware of the
person: brain, nerves, electric charges and interactions, chemical substances,
like save-substances etc. At the psyche the picture is stored to indoors, like
the knowledge to the brain etc.
In the soul the picture is stored to the outside of matter. We
have normally no contact with it. Not the soul is sick, but the psyche if there
ever is something sick. Not soul-doctors, but psychiatrists! The history has
shown, that the translation of the concept "soul" into the Greek and
of that drainage as "psyche" has no longer remained, of that one went
out. That has gone equally crooked, like the assumption of the elementary
substance! Psyche is no longer the same soul, and particle is no longer
If it was like we told, then these facts will
The world is born, lives and dies. Then it will be reborn,
lives and dies - an unfinished consequence of oscillation periods under the
less changed conditions.
If the world would be going this way, why shouldn't do its
sub-structures the way like this? Birth, death, rebirth? Nothing on equal
but on alike ways.
Does it remember disagreeably or agreeably to the
religions? Why should not especially clever and mental bright sighted
persons have recognized, that the world is such a one, before you could
postulate it mathematically? Did prophets know more of the reality?
There would be a creator-world, equal like it might be
An "original" big bang was non-real. At the zero
point, the matter had run a different but obvious material and real
condition for a short time.
Each zero is movable. So anytime in the universe a
heaven-body or a different phenomenon of the matter can run through its
relative zero and then it will be reborn. For example, if you think on the
The matter was a closed and a programmed system with
programs to freedom-degrees, that will lead to a low effect of accidents.
The big bang at the zero is described today as chaotic
start. That won't be correct however, because the relative start already had
a system of order. The energies set free from immense magnitudes did not
came from an overall-bang, but from an immeasurable multiplicity of
matter-conversions, those have run at determined but each other distant
So that the quanta-forming of the gravity was explained
certainly. Practically the mass of the universe was set free in portions and
remained eternally in determined portions, that will never unite itself
Such a model pulls very much consequences to itself, those are
here still not mentioned at all. It shouldn't remain non-discussed. Otherwise we
only remain the alternative:
The universe was originated from the chaos of more
inexplicable or more speculative pre-states per accident and developed
accidentally, with it extended without aim, to cool about aimless in the
eternity of the expansion to the rigidity - a unique, accidental and eternal
process without sense, standing in the only few isles of an accidental and
without aim formed sense. Its description with the quantum theory finally
would lead to non-real condition-models. Who pleases actually such a
philosophical handicap of the research? Some psychiatrists will say:
"Whoever lives following such principles is psychically sick."
Is the whole world crazy today? 06-01-1999 completed: