Ask yourself, please: Why do scientists think of lambda parameter like a mystify state shift? Explaining this, they constructed Dark Matter. All their theories are caused on mysteries of chaos and assumptions and preconditions. Not one closed line leads to a complete knowledge. Everything has been remained a riddle! And for that Nobel-prizes?

But my theory doesn't. Its solution explains the inflation of universe coming out from the complete system of equations and solutions of my theory without contradictions. Let's look if we can briefly explain the thing here without using equations.

Important: Black Holes of my theory solutions are divergently locked Black White Holes BWH! So they are never really black! This way, they are never completely locked. Therefore, they open themselves after a short time having explosions (evaporations) of nearly white holes. These are forming out the structures of the universe. Ich called them COSMS and PROTOCOSMS.

Briefly:

Absolutely, there was no Big Bang! A Small Bang was running first before many other Small bangs were following. The first of them emitted energy and mass from the center of universe. This gigantic energy of the nearly homogeneous radiation arised since this moment. From the same center, but not only came that Small Bang, but an innumerable amount of extremely dense Protocosms laying onto the central Small Bang. They were accelerated by the first free energy until they themselves were evaporating and forming up the structures above the homogeneous central body. This way, looking strictly formally and linearly, the universe seems to be accelerated while its expansion, and it seems to do it presently if you do not cancel the premise of Big Bang, Everything should be coming from the hypothetical Big Bang.

But it does not! Consequently the structures are layed on layer by layer. The illusory picture deceives the observer. Because the complete mass of universe is enough to close it. But not by return of expansion or just simply by a complete fall down. Because there were never a complete rising up, but a piling up of the structures. Therefore, there will be a piling down of layers of structures disappearing into the Protocosms and flying into the center of universe come together with the others, but not uniting with them. Their flight is invisible! Dark! Protocosms are that dark matter! Layer by layer from above to below, just the same way they were built up before by condensation processes. This is the only logic of this real world! You can fill a one door store just by storage in which the last will be the first who will be coming out. The last, these are the layers above in universe. They will be the first, which will be piled down - invisibly for the Nobel-Prize-Winner! How long will it take that they will see the reality?

Expanded explanation:

What do you think about "Big Bang" was not big but "small"? Then the initial cloud of hydrogen could not reach present magnitudes. Before we explain where the matter laying above this small bang comes from, we will look what chance of expanding the Small Bang had. Every scientist knows that if the complete matter we observe today would have exploded in past by "Big Bang", it never could reach the extension of the present universe.

So they found that there must have happened an inflation process. If there wasn't such an inflation, the cold cloud would have stopped on about less than tenth of the present perimeter. Then it were falling to create a Black Hole in the center and an environment, which is covered by cold hydrogen. This really might be the present gigantic core of the gravitational universe how I predict it.

Scientist don't know how the galaxy matter came above such a core if not immediately from this core directly. And so they created the premise of inflation of that cold matter accelerated by itself mysterious varying of lambda parameter of Einstein's General Relativity Theory. All scientist including myself believe that something must be there, what has made the matter laying on such a core of the first bang. Present scientists have no complete answer, because they have no United Field Theory as me with my IOT "Ideal-Oscillator-Theory", also called "The Electrogravitation" (cf. The Book Arcus I and V).

And now we come back to our Small Bang. Is the red shift a different thing, when the bang was a little smaller? No, it isn't. It has a smaller intensity. But nobody knows that intensity necessary for explaining the complete thing. Let us stop here and assume that the Small Bang makes to see our background radiation. Where do we come from if not from the Small Bang?

Imagine that the complex of structures in the beginning of the first bang would have prepared some further bangs. These evaporating Protocosms would lay a little more fare away from the first bang programmed to be the Small Bang. Then this first bang would accelerate the structures of the further bangs by radiations, and they would fly up into the vacuum-sky prepared to be the space for extending particles. Every secondary bang is the intrinsic start of the birth of a galaxy cluster or of the structure made from Hubble bubbles.

If you want to know how the secondary bangs are able to be accelerated by the first bang and how they can fly so long to reach the present elongation of our universe, you have to learn what Protocosms and their special feature Energy-Cosms are and after what calculation they are changing between their states to be phenomena of less mass and opening to phenomena of very big masses of galaxies.

Have a look at my books on amazon.com

My site: https://www.arcusuniverse.com