should have resulted as
antiparticles at the decays. One likes to quote a proof of
this. This is the decay of the K° mesons:
Every person immediately can see that in the counter are more
particles. What balance do they make to universe? Think
and do not forget: Particles and antiparticles annhilate
sometimes or they are compensated by interactions. They radiate themselves totally
to e.m. and/ or g.m. waves. No particle can be
measured!
Every fox calculates the whole problem with me once again.
First, we should remember, that a particle pair, if it is
meeting, is destroyed (annihilated) to photons (to energy
of light). Then it doesn't exist practically anymore. Instead
of its mass, the energy exists purely now. Let's see as foxes,
what will stay for it in counter itself and in denominator
itself after annihilations:
In counter:
The minus pion splits into minus muon
and into antimuon neutrino. The minus muon splits into an
electron, a muon neutrino and an antielectron neutrino. Red
connection lines show, which particles are there at last and
how they give a pair together, which is completely compensated. What does in counter stay? Nothing
remains!
Pairs are symmetrical!
Does something stay in denominator? No, nothing!
Is there anybody still meaning to compare a balance of zero
with a balance of zero? No, I think noone will do it!
Spontaneous break of symmetry does not exist!
(p.
525/526 of my theory) Such a kind of
model is pure nonsense!
Consequently, in the end super brain physicists have known
that. They found a genious idea. The first genius of them was
to construct a symmetric world in result of the Big Bang but watching a total asymmetric world. Now they must research
until the end of their days why symmetry became
"accidentally" an asymmetry. This is a super trading
idea! By the way, they think that neutrinos perhaps would be their
own antiparticle states. Then antineutrinos would not be real
antis, but just neutrinos which had changed their property
"accidentally". With it
the whole system was dammaged. Why, you would ask, are there
real protons and antiprotons? The answers would be:
"Accidentally!" They aren't real, too.
Higgs-particles would explain the mass.
But I give you another prognos:
There are wether Higgs-particles - in that sense they are
constructed by the concept of Higgs, but equality of neutrinos
and antineutrinos!
If my prognos woud be right, the model of a
symmetric start in "Big Bang" had to be denied.
Realtity was: From the beginning there was an asymmetry in
universe from Small Bang!
Higgs particles only would be reflections of the
inner protocosm energy of the baryons (quantum leaps). There, protocosms are
compensated with all their quantum numbers, but not of their
mass. So it results a state of mass with the summary spin of
zero (of boson). But this is the
Mass Block of my theory!
I call it a torso as trunk like an electron-trunk
or a proton-trunk.
If you set together as Mass Block of a particle and an
Antimass Block of an antiparticle, you get a Boson of
compensated quantum numbers totally. They split while pair
formations and give each the mass block resp. the antimass
block. So this special feature I call: Higgs Block
in honor to Prof. Higgs. This has remained of his idea. It is my
model!