ARCUS:  The World Formula and its Solutions

Consequently constructed using the results of Albert Einstein and Max Planck leading to the Unified Field Theory

The Preaching
Again and again: Proofs for big bang?

It's the same like 20 years before. Scientists believe in the big bang because of the signs of their measurements. Don't they know that measurements have the potency to prove more than one theoretic conception?

They say, that they do not need a new theory since they have a complete and brilliant theory. What is the reality?

In the journal "bdw" 6/2001, pp 52, scientists are proud of their results. But 62% of this concept is the part of a chance - that chance that vacuum would have supported intrinsic energy into the complete universe following the arbitrary shift of lambda-parameter of relativity theory. How can somebody be sure at all, that a part of about 62% free precondition coming from anywhere would be a significant condition for a proof? Is this real science now?

Using all the measurements, my theory of small bang guided by a lot of further small bangs around the center of that first small bang has been proved!

Then the center was driven out of another by the energies of the small and heavy protocosms of large numbers. Inside this space of less than just a tenth of the universe diameter, Euclidean coordinates are valid. But outside this central start space, the density is essentially larger and so the coordinates are more curved than you ever can imagine. The universe is closed, but its center - coming out from small bang - is still open and expanding while the universe is closed and oscillating.

Examine it, and you will see, that my theory is better without need of use of such a lot of nonsensical preconditions!

All rights reserved: Arcus (Heinz-Joachim Ackermann, since1998)