SZ of
September 14th 2001, p 26:
"SCIENCE WORLDWIDE
Beside Exactness Accident also Prevails in the Brain
London. The accident has control of fundamental
processes in our brain. One started out from the assumption until now that the brain tries to work exactly
at least. Roger
Carpenter of the University of Cambridge contradicted this
now. Carpenter examined the reaction of brain cells of
different animals to a ray burst. At this, he observed that the
cells responded to the lightning every time differently: once,
they immediately became active, they then reacted a third of a
second later. Different brain's regions answered even
independently of each other at different times. 'Our brain has
a randomizer', the researcher drew a conclusion."
etc.
Arcus on 10-01-2001:
Which conclusion shall one pull then today? One only knows
the randomizer!
My theory IOT predicted already in 1998:
The brain generates the accident as follows. It works
arbitrarily and blurredly. Occasional exactness is the result
of a graphically working processing, which works out
information from blurred reflections. The result is arbitrary,
and so it is also blurred. Next to fundamentally unclear
results of arbitrariness, also sharp hits are born, which are
more the exceptions.
This way, the origin of accidents, I localized in the brains
or in the processing of nerves of living beings. Following my
opinion, in universe is a total initial order on base of the
Creation, which works with exact causality. Just the
arbitrariness of living beings is able to disturb this order
by which the societies of mankind reach the highest magnitude
of chaos. Starting out of this, the researchers conclude
wrongly at present: the accident would be given objectively
from the outside.
With the discovery of Carpenter, a proof is given
that it is vice versa obviously.
