Home

ARCUS:  The World Formula and its Solutions

Consequently constructed using the results of Albert Einstein and Max Planck leading to the Unified Field Theory

 
Articles
The Preaching
 
 
 
 
  
Our Problems with the String Theory

It is told, string theory soon would create the world formula. Either these theorists already are knowing my work and they are trying to turn around my copyright by curving next to my work, or they want to work with time striving for more money with that nonsense, or they don't understand the problem. Originally, strings should be vibrating fathoms (lines), now one has turned them into vibrating areas, into "diaphragms" (cf. "Bild der Wissenschaft" 10/2000, p. 62: Covered dimensions). And now, there should be already 10 spatial dimensions additionally the time dimension. Isn't it fantastic?

I think, there are well over-qualified theorists working enjoying themselves with mathematics without consideration of the real world. Such species already lived in Middle Ages working at proofs for geocentric philosophy with Epicycle Theory. They all have special genes and an average IQ of more than 300.

What for do you need 11 dimensions being a common human understanding the world, if you only need to understand sex? Perhaps there are 11 new positions? Or new techniques? With which membrane area do you do it anyway? With vibrating cardboard?

No, it is much more bad! These strings or these areas are dimensionless in the deep. They aren't spaces as my cosms and protocosms! Consequently, these thinkers are not here, where my visions are already. Our world has three dimensions. An area has two of them. A string is a mathematical line.

Let's see if your common understanding is enough.

  1. How does the gravitation of particles act? Answer: all over the same force and action while slow motion.
  2. We assume that an oscillation or vibration would produce that kind of force.
  3. Which shape should the vibration have acting like described above as gravitation? Should it be a vibrating area or a sphere vibrating at the complete surface?
  4. Are you an area or a string or do you look at yourself watching your body from body-like things?

If you gave here the answer: that might be an area, you have almost reached it. But if you should have favored the spatial surface, then you are inside of the area. Further information, I give with my mathematical proof to exchange force of gravitation and of electrostatic force arising from oscillating particles being almost spatial.

For thinkers who are informed best:

Using vibrating strings, already, Erwin Schrödinger (1887-1961) was successful. He could find a solution of electron orbital, misunderstood until now. That is the so-called wave function. In present physics, particles equal waves and reversed. It doesn't wonder when theorists try to explain the world by means of Schrödinger. However, this will stay without success. Schrödinger has calculated right, but he has distorted the philosophy by exchanging of vectors unintentionally. But his model is made for waves. Resulting from my theory, particles don't equal waves like generally known, but they are spatial oscillation quanta, rather space-waves falling back into themselves - therefore they are pulsating spheres or balls. Because of the rotating partons, they are emitting primary wavequanta into all directions of the spatial environment, and they are receiving such wavequanta coming from all the other particles back to them! So particles are oscillators/ resonators exchanging wavequanta. There is no unity of particles and waves, but that cohesion: Particles are sending and receiving waves. Therefore: waves cannot be their own generators! Their generators are the oscillators/ resonators, here they are elementary particles.

 
 
· All rights reserved: Arcus (Heinz-Joachim Ackermann, since1998) ·