Proof
experiments
1. Experiment to the refutation of the modern models of the
QED and the QCD
My thesis is: Casimir's effect does not come from so-called
"vacuum-fluctuations" but from real particles which
I discovered and which properties I predicted: it is caused by
proton neutrinos.
The measurement equipment of Casimir's effect should work
outside of the space shuttle. In belonging separation to the
earth the proton neutrinos should annihilate themselves
totally at temperatures below 248.5 K. The pressure on the
Casimir-plates should noticeably decrease then, essentially
more than the decrease caused by kinetic energy. If it would
be caused by vacuum then it had the same energy density at all
the positions of the world. If this is not true so these
interactions of Casimir's effect are interactions of real
particles which are formed in the heat of more than 248.5 K.
How far should the shuttle fly? The proton neutrinos must have
enough chance for their permanent annihilation. So they have
to fly far off the atmospheric influence, far off the shuttle
and off the shade of it. In free universe space more proton
neutrinos must annihilate than on earth.
It may be possible, the experiment would be made in
shielding on earth in a laboratory of cold.
2. Proof of antimass
It is absolutely necessary to prove that positrons have a
negative mass. Every present trial was half-hearted because
the united field theory wasn't used.
It's possible to prove the antimass by means of the g.m.
Lorentz force. With electromagnetic Lorentz force a charge
will be forced on a radius in the e.m. field. The same process
should be possible with a moved mass in a gravitomagnetic
field. Then the antimass will be moving into the contrary
curvature of the radius referred to the mass in the field of
rotating masses. Such experiments need big masses, positron
radiators and precise instruments which I haven't.
3. Protocosm qualities
Superconductors make e.m. protocosms. The stronger the
electric current the stronger the curvature of the spacetime
gravitationally and electrically. If we will have the strength
like necessary those synthetic protocosms will prove the
quality of Einstein's theories and of my theory and its
solutions. The proofs are: time shift, geodetic lines
curvature, mass shift, magnetic shift, electric shift. Today
one speaks of "shielding". Think of laying a
protocosm between the gravity centers of the earth and of some
test body, please, what will happen? O.k., both centers must
pass the curvature of geodetic lines of electromagnetism
coupled at gravitomagnetism. These lines deviate the exchange
quanta of both types of forces. The result is a weakening of
the forces, but not only this like seen above. Today you
already could observe like a watch would run about 2% more
slowly at 2% "shielding".
Make the experiment with not only "shielding" as
you expected but additionally you will find the time shift!!
If we'd think at a totally locked protocosm in future we
could do the following experiment:
If you put some substances into a closed protocosm, which
behavior is similar to a black hole, you will get new
life-forms after opening (while state of white hole).
Protocosms arise at high energies. For example, at high e.m.
energies "Kugelblitze" (spherical flashes) arise
from them. These are e.m. protocosms. They include
quantizations of all the universal laws. That kind of flash
makes the new body of life and sets him into this world. This
way, from original soup new life came by
"Kugelblitzes". Not only e.m. protocosms are able to
create new life forms, but primarily these are the g.m.
protocosms. They arise at the impact of particles to each
other. If comets had impacts at the earth, then a multiple
number of different protocosms were made, which created new
life forms by the energy, by the universal law and by the
given material. Researchers already have found such a
cohesion. But they don't know the causes. So they think the
comets themselves would have brought the life here to earth..
4. Possible measurement of particle orbits
In 1990 I found a new constant. This is the electromagnetic
effect quantum m . Max Planck found
the gravitomagnetic effect quantum h in 1900. Both constants
can be calculated into each other. You could think these
magnitudes would be one equal magnitude. But if an electron is
moved in its orbit then for 1 h of the orbit quantum
completely different values are resulting for the combined m
B in this orbit: the orbit of 1h has extremely many
integer extensions of the elementary m
, about 1021 m. From
this premise I conclude:
If you try to indicate particle orbits using gravitational
particle shoots you will arrive the undermost limit of 1h.
Then you only use the gravitational wave energy of the
particles for interaction. Free electric charges aren't there,
with them we could form a wave which would be independent on
the gravitomagnetic wave of the particles. But there must be
one trick to produce e.m. waves at least which underrun that
1h of the g.m. wave while uncoupling from it.
I hope that one fox under you will find that problem, if I
would not be faster.
5 ...
https://www.arcusuniverse.com
|