How
does the Universe actually
oscillate?
Today, one remarks, a "Big Bang" would give the
consequence of an expansion of the "original world."
The effect of the mass attraction could turn the movement
under certain circumstances, whereby the universe also could
concentrate itself. S. W. Hawking is straying from this idea.
His space now should eternally expand in accordance with the
alleged "Big Bang".
However, each simple person knows well more then a sly
philosopher. He surely knows that on one year follows the next,
etc. Everything of this world is connected with a going to and
back. States are changing and turning again on a new manner.
These things are shown by the oscillation! Therefore however
the individual state is to find in the general state of the
universe!
My United Field Theory gives
different declarations in relationship to the present sciences that wants to
see the genius of the presence essentially in Hawking.
Basically each cosm swings, it rather oscillates. So its space or its microcosms
are oscillating! Is this premise also connected with a
repetition of a "Big Bang"? No, the course is much
more complicated. Therefore, you already can see the old
theories only as primitive constructions: Bang - and the
matter runs apart, Bang - and it thunders together again -
completely as a mash? That already is a quite coarse of
contemplation manner, out of that you hardly can interpret the
multiplicity of the phenomena, if you don't cite the
substitute for the Creator that's the accidence.
Nevertheless of complicated connections, the new theory
remains well comprehensible. Underneath, I’m giving here an
illustration from my book and an explanation text:
Page 93:
Illustration 3; 5: Each Cosm in
the Scheme of Basic Structure
1-
Gravity radius r o
respectively incident horizon
2-
Gravity center, center of gravitation
3-
Cosm amplitude Ro (maximum of the free-setting of
inside
mass
at stability),
the negation horizon
4-
Maximum parity orbit of a protocosm over ½Ro,
path of the light
5-
Area of the vacuum sphere Ro = ro - Ro
Each
light that is starting from the point 2 only
can reach the maximum of the orbit as it is shown at the
designation of 4.
...
Scientists suspect now
several universes and "big bangs" side by side. This
thesis is close to my theory. But as long as they don't rule out
the "Big Bang Theory", they will get nothing. No
cosm seed is banging! You see it at the quasars: Spooky energy
quantities stream from them. However, they are not in form of fogs, but
in form of pairs from a subordinate handful of cosm seeds,
which are setting free
local energies. The
temperatures of these energies nevertheless don't reach to
hypothetical 1032 Kelvin like in the Big Bang, but only to the maximum of 6 billion Kelvin from the
electron-positron-annihilation – the origin of the gamma
radiation in series of lightning.
The
"Quantum Theory" therefore leads to a fictive origin
of the movement connections of the particles, to a pure
energetic origin! To an origin, which locally and temporarily never existed this way!
So I mean: The
"Quantum Theory" reflects
energy levels
by means of their waves
on which temperature level the particle
certainly exists few-wisely. This way, it also explains, which
particle types are at these pure levels on scale. Each
unstable particle can approach itself at such a standard, but
it can never give up its programmed identity. Now it seems so,
as you made a fraction distillation and win differently high
scalding fat at different temperatures. Who wants to claim
now, that at the highest temperature of this process all fats
have their origin in this one high scalding fat? For example:
lard and food oil are mixed and heated at 300 °C. Then both
is miscellaneously liquid and physically without difference.
Do both fats origin now from of 300 °C? No, they don't! We heat them both
until they are separating themselves into their particles.
Does their programmatic ancestry lay approximately there? No,
also they don't! Now we heat both fats even at almost 1032 Kelvin.
Maybe do they come from there programmatically? Finally, no!
Each thing is formed out
from the stable particles. And likewise, all particles are
formed from isolated particles. Does the isolation come out
from a stability into the outside? No. However lard descends
of the pig and oil descends for example of seeds of
sunflowers. At 10° C lard gets solid, the oil around swims
inside. At -16 °C then also the oil was getting solid. Has
the oil turned into lard then? No, it has not!
Why therefore do we deduce
all matter from the hottest of all particles on the basis of a
temperature scale in the matter of existing particles at an
assumption of the "Big Bang", if however the
particles live according to an inside construction principle? Scientists
want to standardize and to orientate themselves at the alleged
accidence and they don't know how! This way, the sunflower oil
should come accidentally from the sunflower seeds and the lard
should also accidentally com from the pig.
However: The cosm theory
ELECTROGRAVITATION explains the origin really!
Each stable particle is
given as an elementary base. Particles move through the existing vacuum.
Furthermore, they are implied below different
particle surfaces. They form a hierarchy of systems. Never any stable particle
is possible to change itself by energy support into different
stable particles! Alone at the weak force, the effect changes
to a conversion those peculiarities have nothing to do with a
"particle melting point."
An unstable particle only
decays into the direction that leads to the stable particle, if it also has
the opportunity, therefore if it doesn't move with light speed
in but with less. That temperature scale also
doesn't tell us:
At the inside of the local
stars, the temperature amounts to about 2 x 1013
Kelvin of the stable proton annihilations falling to about 1010
Kelvin of stable electron annihilation. Running to the surface, the temperature
is
falling on some thousand Kelvin.
At the isolated inside of
the particle, which exists in the proton, to organize the
protocosms, the temperature is crucially higher. It reaches to
that suspected and of me calculated 2.4 x 1031
Kelvin of the origin (of that Small Bang inside the particle). That is the temperature of forming pairs of gravitons (subtrons will be
formed at 1028
K). However, here into our universe area, we never find high
temperatures in such a way! To the parceling of our stars, it
gets right cold anyway. Never there was a hot "Big
Bang", but a cold zero walk through the central area of
the universe in analogy of the winter! After this surrounding,
the PK open themselves and evaporate. This is the first
Small Bang.
The
assumption of the "Big Bang" in the consequence of
such a beautiful theory of the waves phenomena, the matter
represents a head-rank of the sciences! In reality, there are
innumerable Small Bangs in universe.
https://www.arcusuniverse.com
https://www.no-quarks.com
|