Home

ARCUS:  The World Formula and its Solutions

Consequently constructed using the results of Albert Einstein and Max Planck leading to the Unified Field Theory

 
Articles
The Preaching
 
 
 
 
  
According late sources, measurements should have resulted:

The center of universe is denser than its margin, in that the galaxies have bigger distances to the margin.

On the basis of the Big bang theory, those premises are wrong in opposite to my theory, one comes to the conclusion:

- After the formation the universe has been driven apart of unfamiliar energies. The expansion had increased. Therefore universe will expand eternally. Conclusion: Expansion might be theoretically going to the eternity.

Mystically looking for the energy into the lambda-parameter of Einstein respectively into the vacuum.

Strange, spectrum red shift was valid as measure for the distances and for the generally "resting" galaxies near us. Hubble-number shoed it. How do you want to agree the assumed increasing expansion to the measured decreasing red shift logically?

To graphic explanation

A proof for biological oscillators

With the measurements one has just proved my theory of the oscillating universe as following:

1. Until now, the universe is not measured as unlimited, but only assumed.

2. Because of my solution, the density of the universe is centrally higher than with the universe elongation R to its amplitude Ro, that is seen by following equations of my theory:

R = Ro cos f ; M = Mo cos≤ f ; V = 4p R≥/3 ; m = mo /cos f .

Compare equation (2.9,21)... on page 368 of my theory.

I compute for you the examples below:

The world radius R is climbing on the amplitude Ro starting with f =p /2, cosines of it is zero. Likewise the distribution of mass M is climbing out of the protocosms to the maximum-mass Mo, that is only selectively given at the amplitude. From Mo and Ro the volume Vo and that density mo are able to be calculated. How big is the density of the cosmic structures in the proximity of its start, in which the universe had a minimum at spatial expansion? It was at the maximum! However the infinite density at spatial zero is avoided through the conversion of the matter into the protocosms.

You see at comparable densities in start and end, the density evolution is less in my theory:

Our own point in universe cannot lay at the amplitude. We although look from a fine place under it at the interior of the universe, and we get an information from different light curvatures. If we only go from the point 11 (amplitude) at the abscissa to point 9, from there the middle of the universe today is between 4 and 5. At 4 density is 60% and at 5 it is 40% less than big bang density. If galaxies distances are about 15% wider, the cubic density is reduced to 52% (1.15 to cubic = 1.52). The difference of density is between 40% and 60% to 50%. Insofar my theory is more next to the reality than others:

 

Big bang

Density

Radius

Radius≥

58229.21

2.6

17

1371.74

9.0

729

171.47

18.0

5832

50.81

27.0

19683

21.43

36.0

46656

10.97

45.0

91125

6.35

54.0

157464

2.68

72.0

373248

1.95

80.0

512000

1.37

90.0

729000

1.00

100.0

1000000

 

Oscillator

Density

Radius

f

-cosf

58229.77

0.002

1.571

1.7∑10-5

10.86

9.207

1.663

0.0920730

5.46

18.316

1.755

0.1831637

3.69

27.078

1.845

0.2707804

2.77

36.087

1.940

0.3608728

2.21

45.218

2.040

0.4521761

1.85

54.149

2.143

0.5414860

1.38

72.374

2.380

0.7237378

1.25

80.114

2.500

0.8011436

1.11

90.192

2.695

0.9019239

1.00

100.000

3.142

1.0000000

From Big bang

 Remark: German numbers in graphics, 0,8 means 0.8 e.g.!

From Oscillator

My space was not running through any expansion. It occurs an elongation of oscillation. With it, the masses of galaxies were unpacked one after the other, by which the amplitude of the space radius ascended from its minimum to its maximum without big bang. The unpacking from the black-white holes is running in portions. Near the center many smaller masses exist in shorter distances. The further of the center of gravity of the universe the galaxies are installed, in that they are ejected from the black-white holes, the bigger will be their distances. The nature reflects this law everywhere where it shows the portions. Please, look yourself at a blossom for example. At its center, where the dust-leaves are, the structures are standing denser. Most bigger forms with bigger distances are at the margin. What was observed here, proves my theory and that solutions again.

 
 
∑ All rights reserved: Arcus (Heinz-Joachim Ackermann, since1998) ∑