Is There any Expansion?
According to
late sources, measurements should have resulted:
The center of universe is denser than its margin, in that
the galaxies have bigger distances to the margin.
On the basis of the Big Bang theory, those premises are
wrong in opposite to my theory, one comes to the conclusion:
After its formation, the universe has been driven
apart of unfamiliar energies. The expansion had increased.
Therefore, universe will expand eternally. Conclusion:
Expansion might be theoretically going to the eternity.
Mystically looking for some energy in lambda-parameter
of Einstein respectively into the vacuum.
Strange, spectrum red shift was valid as measure of the distances and of the generally "resting" galaxies
next to us. Hubble-number would show it. How do you want to agree the
assumed increasing expansion to the measured decreasing red
shift logically?
To
graphic explanation
A
proof of biological oscillators
With the measurements, one has just proved my theory of the
oscillating universe as follows:
1. Currently, the universe is not measured as
unlimited, but only assumed.
2. Because of my solution, the density of the universe
is centrally higher than with the universe elongation R to
its amplitude R o that is seen by following equations of my theory:
R = R o
cos f
; M = Mo
cos² f
; V = 4p
R³/3 ; m
=
mo
/cos f
.
Cf. eq. (2.9,21)... on page 368 of my theory TBA I.
For you, I compute the examples below:
The world radius R is climbing on the amplitude R o
starting with
f
=p
/2,
cosines of it is zero. Likewise, the distribution of mass M is
climbing out of the
protocosms
to the maximum-mass Mo that is only selectively given at the amplitude. From Mo
and Ro,
the volume Vo
and that density mo
are able to be calculated. How big is the density of the
cosmic structures in the proximity of its start in which the
universe had a minimum at spatial extension or elongation? It was at the
maximum! However the infinite density at spatial zero is
avoided through the conversion of the matter into the
protocosms.
You see at comparable densities in start and end, the
density evolution is less in my theory:
Our own point in universe cannot lay at the amplitude. We
although look from a fine place below it at the interior of
the universe, and we get an information from different light
curvatures. If we only go from the point 11 (amplitude) at the
abscissa to point 9, then from there the middle of the universe
today is between 4 and 5. At 4 density is 60% and at 5 it is
40% less than Big Bang density. If galaxies distances are
about 15% wider, the cubic density is reduced to 52% (1.15 to
cubic = 1.52). The difference of density is between 40% and
60% to 50%. So my theory is more close to the reality than
others:
Big bang |
|
|
Density |
Radius |
Radius³ |
58229.21 |
2.6 |
17 |
1371.74 |
9.0 |
729 |
171.47 |
18.0 |
5832 |
50.81 |
27.0 |
19683 |
21.43 |
36.0 |
46656 |
10.97 |
45.0 |
91125 |
6.35 |
54.0 |
157464 |
2.68 |
72.0 |
373248 |
1.95 |
80.0 |
512000 |
1.37 |
90.0 |
729000 |
1.00 |
100.0 |
1000000 |
Oscillator |
|
|
|
Density |
Radius |
f |
-cos f |
58229.77 |
0.002 |
1.571 |
1.7·10-5 |
10.86 |
9.207 |
1.663 |
0.0920730 |
5.46 |
18.316 |
1.755 |
0.1831637 |
3.69 |
27.078 |
1.845 |
0.2707804 |
2.77 |
36.087 |
1.940 |
0.3608728 |
2.21 |
45.218 |
2.040 |
0.4521761 |
1.85 |
54.149 |
2.143 |
0.5414860 |
1.38 |
72.374 |
2.380 |
0.7237378 |
1.25 |
80.114 |
2.500 |
0.8011436 |
1.11 |
90.192 |
2.695 |
0.9019239 |
1.00 |
100.000 |
3.142 |
1.0000000 |
From Big bang
Remark: German numbers in
graphics, 0,8 means 0.8 e.g.!
From Oscillator
My space was not running through any expansion! It occurs
an elongation of oscillation. With it, the masses of galaxies
were unpacked one after the other by which the amplitude of
the space radius increased from its minimum to its maximum
without Big Bang. The unpacking matter from the Black-White Holes is
running in portions. Next to the center, many smaller masses exist
in shorter distances. The farest from center of universe' gravity, the galaxies are installed in that they are
ejected from the Black-White Holes, the bigger will be their
distances. The nature reflects this law everywhere where it
shows the portions. Please, look at a blossom for
example. At its center, where the dust-leaves them, the
structures are standing denser, closer. Most bigger forms of
them with bigger
distances are at the margin. What was observed here, proves my
theory and that solutions again.
https://www.arcusuniverse.com/
https://www.no-quarks.com
|