Higgs-Particles or H°-Bosons
Simply said Prof. Higgs thought these bosons are missing
yet to explain the resting mass of the material elementary particles. There
should be a sea filled with such H-bosons which massless particles had to cross.
While swimming through some mass would stick to them by H-bosons contacting or
Massless particles would be massive by reception of H-bosons.
Physicists must explain everything accidentally. Doing this
they make it especially hard: Accidentally massless particles should collect some
If the universe was filled of H-bosons in the beginning why
is there this selection? In present, why are there particles with resting mass
and particles without?
Scientist just can explain this ba accidents. They are not
able to explain the amounts of masses. That H-particle supports an assumption of
mass, not more. This assumption is even correct. But the complete connection is interpreted or
explained absolutely wrong. This model is unreal and
The view way is
absolutelynaive about which mass will be at all. But my
idea is much simpler: Mass is my expression of the efforts of
things to each other because they were separated before!
The increase or less of this
effort then depend how strong the separation is. Mass then is no
more a thing which one can gather like the physicists wanted
to see it. Mass isn't material! If we put a greater vessel, then more
material fits there. This is the experience of life. But is it correct?
Is this right: The bigger a thing the heavier is it? Does this match on
all things in the universe?
Just this is the problem. The naive way of thinking
of Einstein-physicists should actually a little bit better
than Einstein. But really, however, they are far far remained back
behind him. They always think themselves, mass would be a volume.
However, the crucial point is: Mass is the result of an oscillation,
the correlation between dispersion and collection, between
disconnection and connection! Therefore but only in the retinue of my
theory, elementary particles have a bigger mass with their
smaller radius, however!
And now lets use my theory to explain the problems.
Particles are spatially vibrating bubbles. At their horizon
their degree of the gravitation changes in an opposite development. This means,
they seem to work different to the outside than to inside. The mass packed
inside has an effect on the outside as reciprocon, converted about a constant
only for stable particles. It must otherwise be varied with the lambda factor.
The proton with the outside of about ten highly minus 27 kilograms of rest mass
disposes inside about 280 billions kilogram of packed rest mass! Consequently
the amount of the inner mass determines the outside mass. If two particles like
the protons are shot at each other with enormous energy they aren't destroyed.
They don't shatter. Such assumptions of the present science of proton shattering
The reason in my theory is: Never particles meet on each
other but their wave quanta do it. These quanta produce new particle pairs,
actually known particle pairs, which are forming combinations again to show the
energy which got just effective from the pulse energy of the collision. They are
only shown by their wavequantum interactions. This means: Wave quanta are
everything which we watch. And these are analoga to the photons to
electromagnetic wave packages. At this a reflection is escorted to the outside
by the inside of the proton by the fact that projections arise on the outside,
here by the W- and Z-bosons, now also so-called bosons, especially by H-bosons.
Because protocosms are charged in the first rotation circle of the subparticles
in the proton, one negatively and one positively charged, we get W+ bosons and W-
-bosons as projection. Every W should be reflected only with a W°, taken
exactly. But charges and spin is contrary in the proton, the projection will
appear as charged W. Both show the lowest energy of 80.39 GeV which is converted
After my theory therefore, because the lowest mass of the
two protocosms there is given on the highest inner orbit level in the proton.
The mass is bigger the deeper is the train of orbit. Only one protocosm charged
positively is running there. Its projection is the Z° boson. This is already an
expression of bigger mass in the proton on the second train to inside with 91.19
GeV. With these three protocosms everything makes up his mind the simply
positive cargo load of the proton and the almost triple magnetic momentum. And
now the mass block still is missing - all the innumerable protocosms which are
below the second train and which become more and more and heavier in mass
amounts. This mass-block by its third train in the depth of the inside of the
proton is reflected by the H°-boson of approx. 125 GeV. However, this is only
the third train. Let us look at future if the governments would provide wider
means for the CERN, discovering further HIGGS particles, of which it might give
a quite terribly great crowd of them, after my opinion. See here the proton.
CERN one can research into eternity reflecting heaviest protocosms of
the inside. Such a value of energy is really not given.
Consequently, the find of putative Higgs-particles is a
flopp. They found an energy-correspondence which is matching but which
is no real Higgs-particle!
As we don't have any clues for grading the masses in a
particle cosmos for the time being there, we then only can assume that at first
they possibly increase exponentially but the graph linearly strongly rises up to
the center of the particle inside if the multiplication by such steps of ten.
This may be a parabolic line well E = 80.39 GeV times n^(x times n^y) with n headlevels
of the trains, z=0.04927 and w=1.88367.
If we start out from this hypothesis, then there are the
following H-bosons still to be found:
GeV with about 1000 GeV Higgs-boson
was originally predicted.
etc. up to H°16 with 1.7E+16 GeV.
Proton has a resting mass of 1.6726218E10-27 kg. Using my theory
inside mass is 2.8321E11 kg, about 280 billion!!
Inside a proton its mass block is not formed by one single Higgs boson, but by
16 types and their sum of 8419 single protocosms making internal mass.
How I calculated this: PDF
of an Excel file in German only.
This may be complicated. But only in such a
way a shoe will be made which also can put on from the mass of the
particles. The present explanations are very vague and they will still remain.
They don't earn the hustle and bustle which is organized around them. God has
designed the world as complicatedly as only possibly at all. As simple, as
scientists have thought by their "standard model", the world absolutely isn't
because they have made some mistakes on their way uncovered just by my solutions.
on July 12th 2012 in answer to the discovery of the Higgs-boson "No.